Ward Dianne S, Evenson Kelly R, Vaughn Amber, Rodgers Anne Brown, Troiano Richard P
Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7461, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11 Suppl):S582-8. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000185292.71933.91.
Researchers are increasingly interested in the potential of accelerometers to improve our ability to measure and understand the health impacts of physical activity. Although accelerometers have been available commercially for more than 25 yr, broad consensus about how to use these tools has not been established. At a scientific conference in December 2004, a number of scientists were invited to present papers, serve as reactors or moderators to papers, present posters of original research, or serve as members of an audience knowledgeable about the use of accelerometers. During 2 1/2 d, information about best practices of accelerometer use was presented and suggestions for future research were made. From the collective experience of papers presented and discussions held, five areas of accelerometer use were described. This paper summarizes the best practices and future research needs from those five areas: monitor selection, quality, and dependability; monitor use protocols; monitor calibration; analysis of accelerometer data; and integration with other data sources. Suggestions for reporting standards for journal articles also are presented.
研究人员对加速度计在提高我们测量和理解身体活动对健康影响能力方面的潜力越来越感兴趣。尽管加速度计已在市场上销售超过25年,但关于如何使用这些工具尚未达成广泛共识。在2004年12月的一次科学会议上,邀请了一些科学家发表论文、担任论文的回应者或主持人、展示原创研究海报,或作为了解加速度计使用的听众成员。在两天半的时间里,介绍了加速度计使用的最佳实践信息,并提出了未来研究的建议。根据所发表论文和进行的讨论的集体经验,描述了加速度计使用的五个领域。本文总结了这五个领域的最佳实践和未来研究需求:监测器的选择、质量和可靠性;监测器使用协议;监测器校准;加速度计数据分析;以及与其他数据源的整合。还提出了期刊文章报告标准的建议。