Navazesh M, Christensen C, Brightman V
University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, General Clinical Research Center, Philadelphia.
J Dent Res. 1992 Jul;71(7):1363-9. doi: 10.1177/00220345920710070301.
There is considerable difficulty in the making of initial clinical decisions as to whether a given patient has salivary gland hypofunction, and hence requires additional salivary gland evaluation. This study identified a set of four clinical measures that, together, successfully predicted the presence or absence of salivary gland hypofunction. The four measures were: dryness of lips, dryness of buccal mucosa, absence of saliva produced by gland palpation, and total DMFT; they were derived from discriminant analysis of data collected from 71 individuals with normal and low salivary flow rates. These measures are proposed as criteria for clinical decision-making, as well as for classification of patients in studies of salivary gland dysfunction syndromes. This study also identified unstimulated whole salivary flow rates of 0.12-0.16 mL/min as the critical range separating individuals with salivary gland hypofunction from those with normal gland function.
对于某一特定患者是否存在唾液腺功能减退,进而是否需要进行额外的唾液腺评估,做出初步临床决策存在相当大的困难。本研究确定了一组四项临床指标,这些指标共同成功预测了唾液腺功能减退的存在与否。这四项指标分别是:嘴唇干燥、颊黏膜干燥、触诊腺体无唾液分泌以及龋失补牙面总数(DMFT);它们源自对71名唾液流速正常和较低的个体所收集数据的判别分析。这些指标被提议作为临床决策的标准,以及在唾液腺功能障碍综合征研究中对患者进行分类的标准。本研究还确定,0.12 - 0.16毫升/分钟的非刺激性全唾液流速是区分唾液腺功能减退个体与腺体功能正常个体的临界范围。