• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非接触式红外测温用于筛查儿童发热。

Non-contact infrared thermometry temperature measurement for screening fever in children.

作者信息

Ng Daniel K, Chan Chung-Hong, Lee Robert S, Leung Lettie C

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Ann Trop Paediatr. 2005 Dec;25(4):267-75. doi: 10.1179/146532805X72412.

DOI:10.1179/146532805X72412
PMID:16297301
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the SARS epidemic, mass fever screening at border control points and public hospitals was done by measuring forehead temperature by non-contact infrared thermometry. However, its accuracy is not well documented.

METHODS

We evaluated the agreement of non-contact infrared forehead temperature (NIFT) measurement by comparing NIFT readings with tympanic temperatures taken in children (1 mth to 18 yrs) admitted to the general paediatric wards of Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong.

RESULTS

A total of 567 patients were recruited and 1000 pairs of readings were obtained. The incidence of fever, defined as tympanic temperature (in rectal model) >38 degrees C (100.4 degrees F), was 12.3%. The mean difference between NIFT and tympanic temperature was 2.34 degrees C (4.21 degrees F) and the 95% limit of agreement between NIFT and tympanic temperature was 0.26-4.42 degrees C (0.47-7.96 degrees F). NIFT was significantly lower than tympanic temperature readings. The optimal cut-off point of NIFT derived from the receiver-operator characteristics curve for fever definition was 35.1 degrees C (95.2 degrees F). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of this cut-off point for fever screening were 89.4%, 75.4%, 33.7% and 98.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

NIFT measurement has a reasonable accuracy in detecting tympanic fever in children. However, one should be aware of the high false-positive rate of fever screening using NIFT.

摘要

背景

在严重急性呼吸系统综合症(SARS)流行期间,边境管制点和公立医院通过非接触式红外测温法测量额头温度进行大规模发热筛查。然而,其准确性尚无充分记录。

方法

我们通过比较香港广华医院普通儿科病房收治的1个月至18岁儿童的非接触式红外额头温度(NIFT)读数与鼓膜温度,评估了NIFT测量的一致性。

结果

共招募了567名患者,获得了1000对读数。定义为鼓膜温度(直肠模型)>38摄氏度(100.4华氏度)的发热发生率为12.3%。NIFT与鼓膜温度的平均差值为2.34摄氏度(4.21华氏度),NIFT与鼓膜温度的95%一致性界限为0.26 - 4.42摄氏度(0.47 - 7.96华氏度)。NIFT显著低于鼓膜温度读数。根据用于发热定义的受试者工作特征曲线得出的NIFT最佳截断点为35.1摄氏度(95.2华氏度)。该截断点用于发热筛查的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为89.4%、75.4%、33.7%和98.1%。

结论

NIFT测量在检测儿童鼓膜发热方面具有合理的准确性。然而,应注意使用NIFT进行发热筛查时假阳性率较高。

相似文献

1
Non-contact infrared thermometry temperature measurement for screening fever in children.非接触式红外测温用于筛查儿童发热。
Ann Trop Paediatr. 2005 Dec;25(4):267-75. doi: 10.1179/146532805X72412.
2
Accuracy of parents in measuring body temperature with a tympanic thermometer.家长使用鼓膜温度计测量体温的准确性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2005 Jan 11;6(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-3.
3
[Measurement of fever in children--is infrared tympanic thermometry reliable?].[儿童发热的测量——红外鼓膜测温法可靠吗?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2002 Nov 20;122(28):2700-1.
4
Accuracy of tympanic temperature readings in children under 6 years of age.6岁以下儿童鼓膜温度读数的准确性。
Pediatr Nurs. 1999 Jan-Feb;25(1):39-42.
5
Utility of infrared thermography for screening febrile subjects.红外热成像技术在发热患者筛查中的应用。
Hong Kong Med J. 2013 Apr;19(2):109-15.
6
Infrared tympanic thermometry in comparison with other temperature measurement techniques in febrile children.发热儿童中红外鼓膜测温法与其他体温测量技术的比较。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006 Jan;7(1):48-55. doi: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000185476.35550.b2.
7
A comparison of tympanic and rectal temperatures in term Nigerian neonates.尼日利亚足月新生儿鼓室和直肠温度的比较。
BMC Pediatr. 2012 Jun 25;12:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-86.
8
Accuracy of tympanic and forehead thermometers in private paediatric practice.鼓膜和额部体温计在私人儿科实践中的准确性。
Acta Paediatr. 2014 Feb;103(2):e80-3. doi: 10.1111/apa.12464. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
9
An evaluation of tympanic thermometry in a paediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科鼓膜测温法的评估
Emerg Med J. 2006 Jan;23(1):40-1. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.022764.
10
Reliability of infrared tympanic thermometry in the detection of rectal fever in children.红外鼓膜测温法检测儿童直肠发热的可靠性
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Jan;25(1):21-30. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70350-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of age on comparative diagnostic accuracy of temporal artery thermometers and non-contact infrared thermometers for fever detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.年龄对颞动脉体温计和非接触式红外体温计检测发热的比较诊断准确性的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10332-0.
2
Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers and Thermal Scanners for Human Body Temperature Monitoring: A Systematic Review.非接触式红外体温计和热扫描仪在人体体温监测中的应用:系统评价。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 26;23(17):7439. doi: 10.3390/s23177439.
3
Clinical accuracy of infrared temperature measurement devices: a comparison against non-invasive core-body temperature.
红外测温设备的临床准确性:与非侵入性核心体温的比较。
Clin Med (Lond). 2023 Mar;23(2):157-163. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0252.
4
Infrared image method for possible COVID-19 detection through febrile and subfebrile people screening.通过发热和低热人群筛查进行可能的 COVID-19 检测的红外图像方法。
J Therm Biol. 2023 Feb;112:103444. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103444. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
5
Clinical Accuracy of Non-Contact Forehead Infrared Thermometer Measurement in Children: An Observational Study.儿童非接触式前额红外体温计测量的临床准确性:一项观察性研究。
Children (Basel). 2022 Sep 14;9(9):1389. doi: 10.3390/children9091389.
6
Are all thermometers equal? A study of three infrared thermometers to detect fever in an African outpatient clinic.所有温度计都一样吗?在一家非洲门诊诊所用三种红外体温计测量发热的研究。
PeerJ. 2022 Jun 15;10:e13283. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13283. eCollection 2022.
7
Non-contact infrared assessment of human body temperature: The journal toolbox.人体体温的非接触式红外评估:期刊工具箱
Temperature (Austin). 2021 Apr 26;8(4):306-319. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2021.1899546. eCollection 2021.
8
Review of the efficacy of infrared thermography for screening infectious diseases with applications to COVID-19.红外热成像技术用于筛查传染病及在COVID-19中的应用效果综述。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 Jan;8(Suppl 1):010901. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.S1.010901. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
9
Clinical evaluation of fever-screening thermography: impact of consensus guidelines and facial measurement location.发热筛查热成像的临床评估:共识指南和面部测量位置的影响。
J Biomed Opt. 2020 Sep;25(9). doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.25.9.097002.
10
Investigation of the Impact of Infrared Sensors on Core Body Temperature Monitoring by Comparing Measurement Sites.探讨比较测量部位对红外传感器核心体温监测影响
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 19;20(10):2885. doi: 10.3390/s20102885.