• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾衰竭患者健康相关生活质量的特征描述与比较

Characterisation and comparison of health-related quality of life for patients with renal failure.

作者信息

Lee Amanda J, Morgan Christopher Ll, Conway Pete, Currie Craig J

机构信息

Cardiff Research Consortium, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Nov;21(11):1777-83. doi: 10.1185/030079905X65277.

DOI:10.1185/030079905X65277
PMID:16307698
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the health related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with kidney failure who had received renal transplants compared to those receiving haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or were waiting to start dialysis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The study was conducted at the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff. HRQOL was measured using the EQ-5D, SF-36 and the Kidney Disease Quality of life questionnaire (KDQOL). Patients with kidney failure were identified from the renal unit departmental database and were surveyed by postal questionnaire or during their treatment.

RESULTS

Of 1251 people surveyed, 416 valid returns were received, a response rate of 33%. For renal transplant patients the mean EQ-5Dindex was 0.712 (SD 0.272), significantly higher than those in the other treatment groups (haemodialysis mean = 0.443 (SD 317), p < 0.001; peritoneal dialysis mean = 0.569 (SD 329), p < 0.001). This difference remained after controlling for age and co-morbidity. With the exception of pain, the SF-36 showed significantly higher scores across all domains for transplant patients compared to both dialysis groups. From the KDQOL there were significantly lower scores compared with the transplant patients for both groups of dialysis patients for the effects and burden of kidney disease and general symptoms and problems. However, overall health scores were significantly higher for dialysis patients compared with transplant patients.

CONCLUSION

Kidney failure has a high cost in terms of health related quality of life. There was a large difference between patients who have received a functioning graft following kidney transplant versus the alternative methods of renal replacement therapy, that is, peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis. Kidney transplant should be the treatment of choice, and every effort should be made to increase the availability of kidneys for transplantation.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估接受肾移植的肾衰竭患者与接受血液透析、腹膜透析或等待开始透析的患者相比,其健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。

研究设计与方法

该研究在威尔士大学医院(位于加的夫)进行。使用欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D)、36项简短健康调查量表(SF-36)和肾脏病生活质量问卷(KDQOL)来测量健康相关生活质量。从肾脏科部门数据库中识别出肾衰竭患者,并通过邮寄问卷或在其治疗期间进行调查。

结果

在1251名接受调查的人中,收到了416份有效回复,回复率为33%。肾移植患者的平均EQ-5D指数为0.712(标准差0.272),显著高于其他治疗组(血液透析组平均为0.443(标准差0.317),p<0.001;腹膜透析组平均为0.569(标准差0.329),p<0.001)。在控制年龄和合并症后,这种差异仍然存在。除疼痛外,与两个透析组相比,移植患者在SF-36所有领域的得分均显著更高。从KDQOL来看,两组透析患者在肾病的影响和负担以及一般症状和问题方面的得分与移植患者相比显著更低。然而,透析患者的总体健康得分与移植患者相比显著更高。

结论

肾衰竭在健康相关生活质量方面代价高昂。接受肾脏移植后获得功能正常移植物的患者与肾脏替代治疗的替代方法(即腹膜透析和血液透析)之间存在很大差异。肾移植应是首选治疗方法,应尽一切努力增加可用于移植的肾脏数量。

相似文献

1
Characterisation and comparison of health-related quality of life for patients with renal failure.肾衰竭患者健康相关生活质量的特征描述与比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Nov;21(11):1777-83. doi: 10.1185/030079905X65277.
2
Quality of life of patients having renal replacement therapy.接受肾脏替代治疗的患者的生活质量。
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Jul;51(1):15-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03455.x.
3
Changes in health-related quality of life in Greek adult patients 1 year after successful renal transplantation.希腊成年患者肾移植成功1年后健康相关生活质量的变化。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2006 Dec;4(2):521-4.
4
[Evaluation of health-related quality of life in dialysis patients. Personal experience using questionnaire SF-36].[透析患者健康相关生活质量评估。使用SF-36问卷的个人经验]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2003 Feb;14(80):113-7.
5
Health-related quality of life among haemodialysis patients--relationship with clinical indicators, morbidity and mortality.血液透析患者的健康相关生活质量——与临床指标、发病率和死亡率的关系
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Apr;15(4):498-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01349.x.
6
Quality of life of patients with chronic renal allograft rejection and anemia.慢性肾移植排斥反应合并贫血患者的生活质量
J Nephrol. 2004 Jul-Aug;17(4):531-6.
7
Validation of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form questionnaire in kidney transplant patients.《肾脏病患者生活质量简表》在肾移植患者中的效度验证
J Psychosom Res. 2006 May;60(5):495-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.09.009.
8
Pain affects health-related quality of life in kidney transplant recipients.疼痛会影响肾移植受者与健康相关的生活质量。
Transplant Proc. 2007 May;39(4):1126-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.03.004.
9
The quality of life analysis in renal transplant recipients and dialysis patients.肾移植受者和透析患者的生活质量分析
Georgian Med News. 2011 Nov;11(200):10-7.
10
[Review of quality of life instruments used in end-stage renal disease].[终末期肾病中使用的生活质量评估工具综述]
Nephrologie. 2003;24(6):293-301.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of treatment with finerenone in mild to advanced stage chronic kidney disease patients with type 2 diabetes from a societal perspective.从社会角度看,非奈利酮治疗2型糖尿病轻度至重度慢性肾病患者的成本效益。
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jun 25;3(1):e001288. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001288. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Difelikefalin for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Kidney Disease-Associated Pruritus (CKD-aP) in UK Adult Patients Receiving In-Centre Haemodialysis.地肤利法林治疗接受中心血液透析的英国成年患者中重度慢性肾脏病相关性瘙痒(CKD-aP)的成本效益分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 19;14(12):4361. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124361.
3
The Cost-Effectiveness of Initiating Patients on Home Dialysis Compared with In-Centre Haemodialysis.
启动患者进行家庭透析与中心血液透析相比的成本效益
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May 25. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00976-7.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of targeted-release formulation of budesonide (Tarpeyo) in conjunction with optimized renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) therapy relative to optimized RASi therapy alone for adults with primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy in the United States.在美国,布地奈德(Tarpeyo)靶向释放制剂联合优化肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)治疗相对于单独使用优化RASi治疗对原发性免疫球蛋白A肾病成人患者的成本效益分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 May;31(5):499-509. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.5.499.
5
Scalable ion concentration polarization dialyzer for peritoneal dialysate regeneration.用于腹膜透析液再生的可扩展离子浓度极化透析器。
J Nanobiotechnology. 2025 Mar 29;23(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03294-1.
6
Estimation of Health State Utility Values for Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy: A Time Trade-Off Analysis.免疫球蛋白A肾病健康状态效用值的评估:一项时间权衡分析。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Jan;9(1):83-92. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00527-1. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
7
The Broader Effects of Delayed Progression to End-Stage Kidney Disease: Delaying the Inevitable or a Meaningful Change?延迟进入终末期肾病的更广泛影响:延缓不可避免的结局还是有意义的改变?
Adv Ther. 2024 Oct;41(10):3739-3748. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02950-6. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
8
Hyperkalemia in chronic kidney disease patients with and without heart failure: an Italian economic modelling study.合并或未合并心力衰竭的慢性肾脏病患者的高钾血症:一项意大利经济模型研究
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 May 21;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00547-y.
9
The Impacts of COVID-19 Restrictions on Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY): Heterogeneous effects and post-pandemic recovery.COVID-19 限制措施对质量调整生命年 (QALY) 的影响:异质效应和大流行后复苏。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0300891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300891. eCollection 2024.
10
Digital variance angiography in patients undergoing lower limb arterial recanalization: cost-effectiveness analysis within the English healthcare setting.下肢动脉再通患者的数字血管造影术:英国医疗环境下的成本效益分析
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Mar 22;13(4):e230068. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0068.