Lamy A, Farrokhyar Forough, Kent Rosanne, Wang Xiaoyin, Smith Kelly M, Mullen John C, Carrier Michel, Cheung Anson, Baillot Richard
McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Can J Cardiol. 2005 Nov;21(13):1175-81.
The authors sought to examine in-hospital and one-year outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to determine the subgroups of patients most likely to benefit from the off-pump procedure in a regular surgical practice.
From March 2001 to December 2002, 1657 consecutive patients were treated with off-pump CABG and 1693 consecutive patients were treated with on-pump CABG. Propensity score modelling was performed to control for treatment and selection bias. A propensity-matched analysis was performed to identify factors associated with survival benefit from the off-pump procedure.
The mortality was similar postoperatively and at one year after surgery. The rate of stroke was decreased in the off-pump group postoperatively (OR=0.49, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.06) and significantly at one year after surgery (OR=0.49, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.90). A significant reduction in acute renal dialysis and a significant increase in myocardial infarction rates were seen in off-pump patients during the initial hospitalization but these differences disappeared during the follow-up period. The number of grafts completed was significantly lower in off-pump CABG than in on-pump CABG (2.62+/-1.00 versus 3.36+/-0.92, respectively; P<0.001). Hospital length of stay and the percentage of patients who required mechanical ventilation were significantly lower in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group. At one year after surgery, the adjusted rate of coronary angiogram and revascularization was similar between the two groups, and the adjusted rate of self-reported angina and memory status was significantly better in the off-pump CABG group. Almost all subgroups of patients had a neutral effect or a survival benefit with the off-pump technique.
The results from a Canada-wide multicentre registry showed the safety and effectiveness of off-pump CABG in most subgroups of patients in a regular surgical practice.
作者试图研究非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的院内及一年期预后,并确定在常规外科手术中最有可能从非体外循环手术中获益的患者亚组。
2001年3月至2002年12月,1657例连续患者接受非体外循环CABG治疗,1693例连续患者接受体外循环CABG治疗。采用倾向评分模型来控制治疗和选择偏倚。进行倾向匹配分析以确定与非体外循环手术生存获益相关的因素。
术后及术后一年死亡率相似。非体外循环组术后卒中发生率降低(OR = 0.49,95% CI 0.23至1.06),术后一年显著降低(OR = 0.49,95% CI 0.27至0.90)。非体外循环患者在初始住院期间急性肾透析显著减少,心肌梗死发生率显著增加,但这些差异在随访期间消失。非体外循环CABG完成的移植血管数量显著低于体外循环CABG(分别为2.62±1.00和3.36±0.92;P<0.001)。非体外循环组的住院时间和需要机械通气的患者百分比显著低于体外循环组。术后一年,两组间冠状动脉造影和血运重建的校正率相似,非体外循环CABG组自我报告的心绞痛和记忆状态的校正率显著更好。几乎所有患者亚组采用非体外循环技术均有中性效应或生存获益。
一项加拿大全国多中心注册研究的结果显示,在常规外科手术中,非体外循环CABG对大多数患者亚组具有安全性和有效性。