van Dam Loes C J, van Ee Raymond
Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, PrincetonPlein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Vision Res. 2006 Mar;46(6-7):787-99. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.011. Epub 2005 Nov 23.
We have investigated the role of saccades and fixation positions in two perceptual rivalry paradigms (slant rivalry and Necker cube) and in two binocular rivalry paradigms (grating and house-face rivalry), and we compared results obtained from two different voluntary control conditions (natural viewing and hold percept). We found that for binocular rivalry, rather than for perceptual rivalry, there is a marked positive temporal correlation between saccades and perceptual flips at about the moment of the flip. Across different voluntary control conditions the pattern of temporal correlation did not change (although the amount of correlation did frequently, but not always, change), indicating that subjects do not use different temporal eye movement schemes to exert voluntary control. Analysis of the fixation positions at about the moment of the flips indicates that the fixation position by itself does not determine the percept but that subjects prefer to fixate at different positions when asked to hold either of the different percepts.
我们研究了扫视和注视位置在两种知觉竞争范式(倾斜竞争和内克尔立方体)以及两种双眼竞争范式(光栅和房屋-面孔竞争)中的作用,并比较了从两种不同的自主控制条件(自然观看和保持知觉)下获得的结果。我们发现,对于双眼竞争而非知觉竞争,在翻转时刻左右,扫视与知觉翻转之间存在显著的正时间相关性。在不同的自主控制条件下,时间相关性模式没有变化(尽管相关性的程度经常但并非总是改变),这表明受试者不会使用不同的时间眼动模式来进行自主控制。对翻转时刻左右的注视位置分析表明,注视位置本身并不能决定知觉,但当被要求保持不同的知觉之一时,受试者倾向于注视在不同的位置。