Harrod-Kim Paul, Waldman David L
Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Rochester, Box 648, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Nov;16(11):1459-64. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000175328.72653.CA.
To determine if ultrasound (US) findings of abnormal portal venous flow (APVF) before transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation are predictive of increased mortality risk after TIPS creation.
Retrospective review of 141 patients with US before TIPS creation was performed. APVF was defined by (i) bidirectional flow, (ii) thrombus, and/or (iii) reversed flow. Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores were calculated. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to detect survival differences based on the presence of APVF. Multivariate analysis included APVF, MELD, Child-Pugh class, International Normalized Ratio, creatinine level, total bilirubin level, ascites, hepatocellular carcinoma, low serum sodium level, congestive heart failure, and myocardial infarction.
Twenty-six percent of patients (36 of 141) exhibited APVF on US before TIPS creation. Patients with APVF had lower survival rates at 3 and 6 months after TIPS procedures in comparison with patients with normal portal flow (P = .02 at 3 months and P = .04 at 6 months). In patients with MELD scores lower than 18, there was decreased survival based on APVF at 1, 3, and 6 months (P = .04, P = .02, and P = .04, respectively). In patients with MELD scores of 18 or greater, there was a trend for lower survival rates with APVF, but it did not reach statistical significance. Multivariate analysis of patients with MELD scores lower than 18 demonstrated only APVF and low serum sodium levels as independent predictors of outcome, with APVF resulting in a greater than six-fold increased likelihood of mortality.
US findings of APVF before TIPS creation are associated with increased mortality risk and may be useful in identifying patients otherwise considered safe candidates based on MELD score alone.
确定经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)建立前超声(US)检查发现的门静脉血流异常(APVF)是否可预测TIPS建立后死亡风险增加。
对141例TIPS建立前接受超声检查的患者进行回顾性分析。APVF定义为:(i)双向血流,(ii)血栓,和/或(iii)反向血流。计算终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和对数秩检验来检测基于APVF存在与否的生存差异。多因素分析包括APVF、MELD、Child-Pugh分级、国际标准化比值、肌酐水平、总胆红素水平、腹水、肝细胞癌、低血钠水平、充血性心力衰竭和心肌梗死。
26%的患者(141例中的36例)在TIPS建立前的超声检查中表现出APVF。与门静脉血流正常的患者相比,APVF患者在TIPS术后3个月和6个月的生存率较低(3个月时P = 0.02,6个月时P = 0.04)。在MELD评分低于18的患者中,基于APVF,1个月、3个月和6个月时生存率降低(分别为P = 0.04、P = 0.02和P = 0.04)。在MELD评分18或更高的患者中,APVF患者生存率有降低趋势,但未达到统计学意义。对MELD评分低于18的患者进行多因素分析显示,只有APVF和低血钠水平是结局的独立预测因素,APVF导致死亡可能性增加超过6倍。
TIPS建立前超声检查发现的APVF与死亡风险增加相关,可能有助于识别那些仅根据MELD评分被认为是安全候选者的患者。