Suppr超能文献

择期经颈静脉肝内门体分流术创建后的生存情况:用终末期肝病模型评分进行预测

Survival after elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: prediction with model for end-stage liver disease score.

作者信息

Ferral Hector, Gamboa Pablo, Postoak Darren W, Albernaz Vanessa S, Young Carmen R, Speeg Kermitt V, McMahan C Alex

机构信息

Dept of Radiology, Div of Cardiovascular and Special Interventions, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2004 Apr;231(1):231-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2311030967. Epub 2004 Feb 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability of a model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score to predict survival in a diverse group of patients who underwent elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in two tertiary care institutions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent elective TIPS creation in two institutions between May 1, 1999, and June 1, 2002, were selected. Patients who underwent emergency TIPS creation were excluded. One hundred sixty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. The MELD score was computed and compared with the survival rate. Survival curves were estimated with Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates and were compared with the log-rank test. Accuracy of the model was evaluated with the c statistic.

RESULTS

The survival rate for all patients was 88.4% at 30 days, 78.1% at 3 months, and 71.8% at 6 months. Significantly lower survival rates were found in patients with MELD scores of 18 or more in comparison to those with MELD scores of 17 or less (P =.001). The c statistic for prediction of 3-month survival on the basis of the MELD score was 0.76. The early (30-day) death rate for this series was 11.4%. There was a significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate between patients with MELD scores of 17 or less and those with scores of 18 or more (P =.001). Patients who underwent TIPS creation for the management of refractory ascites had a significantly lower survival rate in comparison to that for the management of variceal bleeding (P =.001).

CONCLUSION

Results confirm that after elective TIPS creation, patients with a MELD score of 18 or more have a significantly lower 3-month survival rate than do those with a MELD score of 17 or less.

摘要

目的

评估终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分预测两组在两家三级医疗机构接受择期经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的不同患者生存率的能力。

材料与方法

选取1999年5月1日至2002年6月1日期间在两家机构接受择期TIPS手术的患者。排除接受急诊TIPS手术的患者。166例患者符合纳入标准。计算MELD评分并与生存率进行比较。采用Kaplan-Meier乘积限估计法估计生存曲线,并通过对数秩检验进行比较。用c统计量评估模型的准确性。

结果

所有患者30天生存率为88.4%,3个月时为78.1%,6个月时为71.8%。MELD评分为18分及以上的患者生存率显著低于MELD评分为17分及以下的患者(P = 0.001)。基于MELD评分预测3个月生存率的c统计量为0.76。该系列患者的早期(30天)死亡率为11.4%。MELD评分为17分及以下的患者与评分为18分及以上的患者30天死亡率存在显著差异(P = 0.001)。因难治性腹水接受TIPS手术的患者生存率显著低于因静脉曲张出血接受TIPS手术的患者(P = 0.001)。

结论

结果证实,择期TIPS手术后,MELD评分为18分及以上的患者3个月生存率显著低于MELD评分为17分及以下的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验