• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者年龄可能预示着中危个体经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗后的早期死亡率。

Older patient age may predict early mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation in individuals at intermediate risk.

机构信息

Department of Radiology/Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Jul;24(7):941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.03.018. Epub 2013 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2013.03.018
PMID:23707226
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic factors for early mortality among patients with intermediate-risk Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single-institution retrospective study, 47 patients (31 men; mean age, 54 y) with intermediate MELD scores (ie, 18-25) underwent TIPS creation between 1999 and 2012. Medical records were reviewed to identify demographic (age, sex), liver disease (Child-Pugh, MELD), and procedure data (indication, urgency, stent type, portosystemic pressure gradient reduction, complications), and the influence of these parameters on 90-day mortality was assessed by multivariate binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

TIPSs were successfully created for variceal hemorrhage (n = 24), ascites (n = 17), hydrothorax (n = 5), and portal vein thrombosis (n = 1). Hemodynamic success rate was 94% (44 of 47), and mean portosystemic pressure gradient reduction was 13 mm Hg. The 90-day mortality rate was 36% (17 of 47). Patient age (P = .026) was significantly associated with 90-day mortality. Mean ages of living versus dead patients were 51 and 60 years, and mortality rates in patients aged 54 years or younger versus 55 years or older were 21% (five of 24) and 52% (12 of 23), respectively. There was no difference in MELD scores between these age groups (20.6 vs 21.0; P = .600), and MELD score was not a predictive factor on regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Age is a prognostic factor for early mortality in TIPS recipients with intermediate MELD scores. Mortality rates are higher in patients at least 55 years of age, but MELD score does not predict survival in this subset. Age should be contemplated when selecting patients at intermediate risk for TIPS creation.

摘要

目的

确定接受经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)治疗的中危终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分患者早期死亡的预后因素。

材料与方法

本研究为单中心回顾性研究,1999 年至 2012 年间,47 例中危 MELD 评分(即 18-25 分)患者接受 TIPS 治疗。回顾病历资料,记录患者的人口统计学(年龄、性别)、肝脏疾病(Child-Pugh、MELD)和手术数据(适应证、紧急情况、支架类型、门体压力梯度降低、并发症),并采用多变量二项逻辑回归分析评估这些参数对 90 天死亡率的影响。

结果

TIPS 成功用于治疗静脉曲张出血(n=24)、腹水(n=17)、胸水(n=5)和门静脉血栓形成(n=1)。血流动力学成功率为 94%(44/47),平均门体压力梯度降低 13mmHg。90 天死亡率为 36%(47/134)。患者年龄(P=0.026)与 90 天死亡率显著相关。存活患者的平均年龄为 51 岁,死亡患者的平均年龄为 60 岁,年龄在 54 岁及以下患者的死亡率为 21%(24 例中的 5 例),年龄在 55 岁及以上患者的死亡率为 52%(23 例中的 12 例)。这两组患者的 MELD 评分无差异(20.6 与 21.0;P=0.600),MELD 评分不是回归分析的预测因素。

结论

年龄是中危 MELD 评分 TIPS 治疗患者早期死亡的预后因素。年龄至少 55 岁的患者死亡率较高,但 MELD 评分不能预测该亚组的生存率。在选择中危 TIPS 治疗患者时应考虑年龄因素。

相似文献

1
Older patient age may predict early mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation in individuals at intermediate risk.老年患者年龄可能预示着中危个体经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗后的早期死亡率。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Jul;24(7):941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.03.018. Epub 2013 May 23.
2
Prognostic capability of different liver disease scoring systems for prediction of early mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation.不同肝病评分系统预测经颈静脉肝内门体分流术创建后早期死亡率的预后能力。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Mar;24(3):411-20, 420.e1-4; quiz 421. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.10.026. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
3
TIPS for treatment of variceal hemorrhage: clinical outcomes in 128 patients at a single institution over a 12-year period.食管胃静脉曲张出血治疗要点:单中心 12 年 128 例患者的临床转归。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):227-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.10.015. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
4
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in liver transplant recipients for management of refractory ascites: clinical outcome.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗肝移植受者难治性腹水:临床转归。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.025.
5
MELD score as a predictor of early death in patients undergoing elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedures.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分作为接受择期经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)患者早期死亡的预测指标。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005 May-Jun;28(3):307-12. doi: 10.1007/s00270-004-0145-y.
6
Survival after elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: prediction with model for end-stage liver disease score.择期经颈静脉肝内门体分流术创建后的生存情况:用终末期肝病模型评分进行预测
Radiology. 2004 Apr;231(1):231-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2311030967. Epub 2004 Feb 27.
7
Predictors of early mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for the treatment of refractory ascites.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗难治性腹水后早期死亡的预测因素
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006 Oct;17(10):1605-10. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000240651.38289.4B.
8
Impact of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation on intermediate-term model for end-stage liver disease score progression.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的建立对终末期肝病模型中期评分进展的影响。
Transplant Proc. 2014 Jun;46(5):1384-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.12.053.
9
A case-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts after liver transplantation.肝移植后门静脉-肝内分流术的安全性和有效性的病例对照研究。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Jul;17(7):771-8. doi: 10.1002/lt.22281.
10
Right atrial pressure may impact early survival of patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation.右心房压力可能会影响接受经颈静脉肝内门体分流术患者的早期生存率。
Ann Hepatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;13(4):411-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Older Age and TIPS-Related Hospitalization Following Shunt Placement.年龄较大与分流术后TIPS相关住院之间的关联。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 May 21;2025:8894058. doi: 10.1155/cjgh/8894058. eCollection 2025.
2
Utility of Advanced Age as a Predictor of Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.高龄作为经颈静脉肝内门体分流术患者预后预测指标的效用
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Mar 1. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-08940-0.
3
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Outcomes in the Elderly Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
老年人群经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Gastroenterology Res. 2022 Dec;15(6):325-333. doi: 10.14740/gr1571. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
Safety and feasibility of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in elderly patients with liver cirrhosis and refractory ascites.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗肝硬化合并难治性腹水老年患者的安全性和可行性。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0235199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235199. eCollection 2020.
5
Outcomes After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Cirrhotic Patients 70 Years and Older.70岁及以上肝硬化患者经颈静脉肝内门体分流术后的结局
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 31;9(2):381. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020381.
6
Cirrhotic patients and older people.肝硬化患者和老年人。
World J Hepatol. 2019 Sep 27;11(9):663-677. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i9.663.
7
Long-term patency and clinical outcome of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt using the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene stent-graft.经聚四氟乙烯扩张型支架建立经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的长期通畅率和临床结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0212658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212658. eCollection 2019.
8
Primary constrained TIPS for treating refractory ascites or variceal bleeding secondary to hepatic cirrhosis.用于治疗肝硬化继发难治性腹水或静脉曲张出血的原发性经颈静脉肝内门体分流术。
Br J Radiol. 2018 Feb;91(1083):20170409. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170409. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
9
Predictors of mortality after transjugular portosystemic shunt.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术后死亡的预测因素。
World J Hepatol. 2016 Apr 18;8(11):520-9. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i11.520.