Suppr超能文献

不同肝病评分系统预测经颈静脉肝内门体分流术创建后早期死亡率的预后能力。

Prognostic capability of different liver disease scoring systems for prediction of early mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago, 1740 West Taylor Street, MC 931, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Mar;24(3):411-20, 420.e1-4; quiz 421. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.10.026. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the performance of various liver disease scoring systems in predicting early mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single-institution retrospective study, eight scoring systems were used to grade liver disease in 211 patients (male-to-female ratio = 131:80; mean age, 54 y) before TIPS creation from 1999-2011. Scoring systems included bilirubin level, Child-Pugh (CP) score, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease sodium (MELD-Na) score, Emory score, prognostic index (PI), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) 2 score, and Bonn TIPS early mortality (BOTEM) score. Medical record review was used to identify 30-day and 90-day clinical outcomes. The relationship of scoring parameters with mortality outcomes was assessed with multivariate analysis, and the relative ability of systems to predict mortality after TIPS creation was evaluated by comparing area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.

RESULTS

TIPS were successfully created for variceal hemorrhage (n = 121), ascites (n = 72), hepatic hydrothorax (n = 15), and portal vein thrombosis (n = 3). All scoring systems had a significant association with 30-day and 90-day mortality (P<.050 in each case) on multivariate analysis. Based on 30-day and 90-day AUROC, MELD (0.878, 0.816) and MELD-Na (0.863, 0.823) scores had the best capability to predict early mortality compared with bilirubin (0.786, 0.749), CP (0.822, 0.771), Emory (0.786, 0.681), PI (0.854, 0.760), APACHE 2 (0.836, 0.735), and BOTEM (0.798, 0.698), with statistical superiority over bilirubin, Emory, and BOTEM scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Several liver disease scoring systems have prognostic value for early mortality after TIPS creation. MELD and MELD-Na scores most effectively predict survival after TIPS creation.

摘要

目的

比较各种肝病评分系统在预测经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)治疗后早期死亡率的表现。

材料与方法

本研究为单中心回顾性研究,纳入 1999 年至 2011 年期间 211 例行 TIPS 治疗的患者,男 131 例,女 80 例,平均年龄 54 岁。使用 8 种评分系统评估患者术前的肝脏疾病情况,包括胆红素水平、Child-Pugh(CP)评分、终末期肝病模型(MELD)和终末期肝病模型钠(MELD-Na)评分、Emory 评分、预后指数(PI)、急性生理学与慢性健康评估(APACHE)2 评分和 Bonn TIPS 早期死亡率(BOTEM)评分。通过病历回顾确定患者 30 天和 90 天的临床结局。采用多变量分析评估评分参数与死亡率之间的关系,并通过比较受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUROC)评估系统预测 TIPS 治疗后死亡率的相对能力。

结果

211 例患者中,121 例因静脉曲张出血、72 例因腹水、15 例因肝性胸水、3 例因门静脉血栓形成行 TIPS 治疗。多元分析显示,所有评分系统与 30 天和 90 天死亡率均有显著相关性(P<.050)。基于 30 天和 90 天 AUROC,MELD(0.878,0.816)和 MELD-Na(0.863,0.823)评分预测早期死亡率的能力优于胆红素(0.786,0.749)、CP(0.822,0.771)、Emory(0.786,0.681)、PI(0.854,0.760)、APACHE 2(0.836,0.735)和 BOTEM(0.798,0.698)评分,且优于胆红素、Emory 和 BOTEM 评分。

结论

多种肝病评分系统对 TIPS 治疗后早期死亡率有预后价值。MELD 和 MELD-Na 评分可最有效地预测 TIPS 治疗后的生存率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验