Suppr超能文献

有和没有盆底功能障碍的女性的肛门失禁情况。

Anal incontinence in women with and those without pelvic floor disorders.

作者信息

Nichols Catherine Matthews, Ramakrishnan Viswanathan, Gill Edward J, Hurt W Glenn

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Virginia/Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Dec;106(6):1266-71. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000187303.43011.12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prevalence of anal incontinence and anal sphincter injury in women with pelvic floor disorders (cases) with those in a group of normal control subjects and to evaluate the relationship between sphincter injury and anal incontinence in each group.

METHODS

We previously reported the results of a cross-sectional study of 100 women with pelvic floor disorders (> or = stage II pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence). In this study, we compared those cases with 90 controls (stage 0 or I pelvic organ prolapse and no urinary incontinence) who completed the Rockwood-Thompson fecal incontinence severity index, in which scoring (0-61) is based on the frequency and type of anal incontinence. All women underwent endoanal ultrasonography, and the internal and external anal sphincters were reported as intact versus disrupted. Chi-square test, Student t test, and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Women with pelvic floor disorders were significantly more likely to report anal incontinence (54% versus 17.8%, odds ratio [OR] 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-10.6, P < .001) and had higher mean fecal incontinence severity index scores (22.3 +/- 13 versus 12.7 +/- 6.3, P = .006) than controls. Cases demonstrated higher rates of anal sphincter defects on ultrasound examination than did controls (52% versus 30%, P = .007). Anal incontinence was significantly associated with anal sphincter injury in women with pelvic floor disorders (OR 36.4, 95% CI 12-114, P < .001) and in controls (OR 5.9, 95% CI 3-11, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Anal incontinence was more common in women with pelvic floor disorders than normal controls and may be due to higher rates of anatomic anal sphincter disruption in this group.

摘要

目的

比较盆底功能障碍女性(病例组)与正常对照组肛门失禁及肛门括约肌损伤的患病率,并评估每组中括约肌损伤与肛门失禁之间的关系。

方法

我们之前报告了一项对100名盆底功能障碍女性(≥Ⅱ期盆腔器官脱垂和/或尿失禁)的横断面研究结果。在本研究中,我们将这些病例与90名对照组女性(0或Ⅰ期盆腔器官脱垂且无尿失禁)进行比较,对照组女性完成了Rockwood-Thompson大便失禁严重程度指数评估,该指数评分(0 - 61分)基于肛门失禁的频率和类型。所有女性均接受了肛管超声检查,并报告内外肛门括约肌是否完整。采用卡方检验、学生t检验和逻辑回归进行统计分析。

结果

盆底功能障碍女性报告肛门失禁的可能性显著高于对照组(54%对17.8%,优势比[OR] 5.4,95%置信区间[CI] 2.8 - 10.6,P <.001),且大便失禁严重程度指数平均得分更高(22.3±13对12.7±6.3,P =.006)。病例组超声检查显示肛门括约肌缺陷的发生率高于对照组(52%对30%,P =.007)。在盆底功能障碍女性中,肛门失禁与肛门括约肌损伤显著相关(OR 36.4,95% CI 12 - 114,P <.001),在对照组中也是如此(OR 5.9,95% CI 3 - 11,P =.002)。

结论

盆底功能障碍女性肛门失禁比正常对照组更常见,可能是由于该组解剖学上肛门括约肌断裂的发生率更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验