Moise Kenneth J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7516, USA,
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Dec;106(6):1393-407. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000188388.84901.e4.
Until recently, blood that remained in the umbilical cord and placenta after delivery was routinely discarded. Now that this blood is known to contain both hematopoietic stem cells and pluripotent mesenchymal cells, there has been a substantial increase in the clinical use and research investigation of umbilical cord blood in hematopoietic transplantation and regenerative medicine. Until now, standards for collection and processing were not well established. The debate continues regarding the private banking of autologous blood for "biologic insurance" versus public banking for access by the general population. Obstetricians should support the acquisition of cord units for public banking in their geographic location where cord blood banks have established collection procedures. Issues related to cost, quality control, and the need for ethnic diversity in public banks preclude the universal collection of units from all obstetric deliveries. Directed donation of cord blood should be considered when there is a specific diagnosis of a disease within a family known to be amenable to stem cell transplantation.
直到最近,分娩后残留在脐带和胎盘里的血液通常都被丢弃。既然已知这种血液含有造血干细胞和多能间充质细胞,那么在造血移植和再生医学中,脐带血的临床应用和研究调查就大幅增加。到目前为止,采集和处理标准尚未完全确立。关于为“生物保险”进行自体血的私人储存与为普通大众提供使用机会的公共储存之间的争论仍在继续。产科医生应支持在其所在地区将脐带血单位采集到公共库中,前提是该地区的脐带血库已制定了采集程序。与成本、质量控制以及公共库中种族多样性需求相关的问题,使得无法对所有产科分娩的脐带血单位进行普遍采集。当已知某个家族有特定疾病诊断且适合干细胞移植时,应考虑定向捐赠脐带血。