• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定药物法庭项目中治疗结果的预测因素。

Identifying predictors of treatment outcome in a drug court program.

作者信息

Roll John M, Prendergast Michael, Richardson Kimberly, Burdon William, Ramirez Anthony

机构信息

Friends Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2005;31(4):641-56. doi: 10.1081/ada-200068428.

DOI:10.1081/ada-200068428
PMID:16320439
Abstract

Drug courts are popular for dealing with drug-abusing offenders. However, relatively little is known about participant characteristics that reliably predict either success or failure in these treatment settings. In this article, we report on 99 individuals who were enrolled in a drug court program (approximately one-half of whom successfully completed the program). Using, logistic regression techniques we identified 2 significant predictors of outcome. First, individuals who were employed at the time of their enrollment into the drug court program were more likely to successfully complete the treatment program. Second, individuals with a history of illicit intravenous drug use were less likely to complete the program.

摘要

毒品法庭在处理吸毒罪犯方面很受欢迎。然而,对于能够可靠预测这些治疗环境中成功或失败的参与者特征,人们了解得相对较少。在本文中,我们报告了99名参加毒品法庭项目的个体(其中约一半成功完成了该项目)。使用逻辑回归技术,我们确定了两个结果的显著预测因素。首先,在进入毒品法庭项目时就业的个体更有可能成功完成治疗项目。其次,有非法静脉注射吸毒史的个体完成该项目的可能性较小。

相似文献

1
Identifying predictors of treatment outcome in a drug court program.确定药物法庭项目中治疗结果的预测因素。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2005;31(4):641-56. doi: 10.1081/ada-200068428.
2
Drug treatment courts are popular but do they work and are they ethical and appropriate for Canada?毒品治疗法庭很受欢迎,但它们有效吗?它们在加拿大是否符合伦理道德且适用呢?
Health Law Can. 2003 May;23(4):70-9.
3
Treatment inside the drug treatment court: the who, what, where, and how of treatment services.药物治疗法庭内的治疗:治疗服务的对象、内容、地点及方式。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1665-88. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014426.
4
The Experiences of Young Adult Offenders Who Completed a Drug Court Treatment Program.
Qual Health Res. 2017 Apr;27(5):750-758. doi: 10.1177/1049732316645782. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
5
A decade of drug treatment court research.十年的药物治疗法庭研究。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1489-527. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014420.
6
Symptoms of depression and successful drug court completion.抑郁症状与成功完成药物法庭程序。
Community Ment Health J. 2013 Dec;49(6):787-92. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9595-5. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
7
Drug treatment courts--a viable option for Canada? Sentencing issues and preliminary findings from the Toronto court.毒品治疗法庭——加拿大的一个可行选择?量刑问题及多伦多法庭的初步调查结果。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1529-66. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014421.
8
Preliminary analysis of the Northern Territory's illicit drug court diversion program highlights the need to examine lower program completion rates for indigenous clients.对北领地非法药物法庭转移计划的初步分析突出表明,需要审查土著客户较低的计划完成率。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011 Nov;30(6):671-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00275.x. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
9
Criminal justice and the drug-abusing offender: policy issues of coerced treatment.刑事司法与药物滥用罪犯:强制治疗的政策问题
Behav Sci Law. 1991 Summer;9(3):243-67. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370090304.
10
The challenges of conducting research in drug treatment court settings.在药物治疗法庭环境中开展研究的挑战。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1635-64. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014425.

引用本文的文献

1
A Social History of Opioids' Crimedical Cycle.阿片类药物犯罪循环的社会史。
Addict Res Theory. 2024;32(6):446-454. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2023.2282528. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
2
Defining and Predicting Opioid and Cocaine Treatment Response.定义和预测阿片类药物和可卡因治疗反应。
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(13):2134-2143. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1638405. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
3
US Veterans' Court Programs: An Inventory and Analysis of National Survey Data.美国退伍军人法庭项目:全国调查数据的盘点与分析
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Feb;52(2):180-6. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9972-3. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of California's Proposition 36 and Drug Court Programs Before and After Propensity Score Matching.加州第36号提案与药物法庭项目在倾向得分匹配前后的比较效果
Crime Delinq. 2014 Sep;60(6):909-938. doi: 10.1177/0011128710382342.
5
Symptoms of depression and successful drug court completion.抑郁症状与成功完成药物法庭程序。
Community Ment Health J. 2013 Dec;49(6):787-92. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9595-5. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
6
Predictors of stimulant abuse treatment outcomes in severely mentally ill outpatients.严重精神障碍门诊患者兴奋剂滥用治疗结局的预测因素。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Jul 1;131(1-2):162-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.11.017. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
7
Differential outcomes of court-supervised substance abuse treatment among California parolees and probationers.加利福尼亚州假释人员和缓刑人员中法院监管的药物滥用治疗的不同结果。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2012 Jun;56(4):539-56. doi: 10.1177/0306624X11404827. Epub 2011 Apr 24.
8
Effectiveness of intervention on improvement of drug use among methadone maintained adults.干预措施对美沙酮维持治疗成人药物使用改善的效果。
J Addict Dis. 2011 Jan;30(1):6-16. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2010.531669.
9
Adaptive Interventions in Drug Court: A Pilot Experiment.药物法庭中的适应性干预措施:一项试点实验。
Crim Justice Rev. 2008;33(3):343-360. doi: 10.1177/0734016808320325.