Suppr超能文献

与标准袋阀面罩相比,使用SMART BAG培训后急诊护士通气技能的保持情况。

Retention of ventilation skills of emergency nurses after training with the SMART BAG compared to a standard bag-valve-mask.

作者信息

De Regge Melissa, Vogels Catherine, Monsieurs Koenraad G, Calle Paul A

机构信息

Critical Care Department, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2006 Mar;68(3):379-84. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.07.013. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Studies show that nurses retain resuscitation skills poorly and that retention of ventilation skills is particularly difficult. We formed the hypothesis that the SMART BAG (SB, O-Two Medical Technologies Inc., Canada), i.e. a bag-valve-mask device with a pressure/flow responsive valve, would assist nurses in providing more efficient ventilation six months after training.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prior to training, 39 emergency nurses performed CPR for 2 min, in pairs, using a standard bag-valve-mask device (STBVM, Laerdal, Norway) to assess their base line skills. A CPR training manikin (Simulaids, USA) equipped with a PEEP valve in the oesophagus set at 20 cm H2O was used to measure inspiratory time, tidal volume (Vt), peak pressure and gastric insufflation (GI). Immediately following training they were tested using an O-Two STBVM and a SB. Half of the nurses were retested after three months, the other half after six months. Efficient ventilation was defined as a mean Vt>400 ml and GI<50 ml in 1 min.

RESULTS

Before training, only 16% of nurses ventilated efficiently: 63% had GI and 28% had Vt<400 ml. Three months after training the efficiency of the STBVM and the SB was high (81 and 75%, respectively). Six months after training, there was a trend towards higher efficiency for the SB (63%) compared to the STBVM (25%) (p=0.07). For instances with the STBVM producing a Vt>400 ml, those without GI had a lower peak pressure than those with GI (7.8 cm H2O versus 17.7 cm H2O, p=0.0001) and showed a trend towards a longer inspiratory time (1.28 s versus 1.08 s, p=0.08). Of all efficient ventilations with a STBVM, 26% had a Vt>600 ml.

CONCLUSIONS

Six months after training, nurses ventilated at least as efficiently with the SB, compared with the STBVM. This illustrates the ability of the SB to compensate for the deterioration over time in skill. On the other hand, training with a STBVM should focus primarily on prolonging the inspiratory time, and therefore the peak pressure, whilst maintaining an adequate Vt.

摘要

背景与目的

研究表明护士对复苏技能的掌握情况较差,尤其是通气技能的保持尤为困难。我们提出一个假设,即SMART BAG(SB,加拿大O-Two医疗技术公司生产),也就是一种带有压力/流量感应阀的袋阀面罩装置,能够帮助护士在培训六个月后提供更有效的通气。

材料与方法

在培训前,39名急诊护士两人一组使用标准袋阀面罩装置(STBVM,挪威Laerdal公司生产)进行2分钟的心肺复苏,以评估他们的基线技能。使用一个配备有设置为20 cm H2O食管呼气末正压阀的心肺复苏训练人体模型(美国Simulaids公司生产)来测量吸气时间、潮气量(Vt)、峰值压力和胃充气量(GI)。培训结束后立即使用O-Two STBVM和SB对他们进行测试。一半护士在三个月后重新测试,另一半在六个月后重新测试。有效通气定义为1分钟内平均Vt>400 ml且GI<50 ml。

结果

培训前,只有16%的护士通气有效:63%的护士有胃充气,28%的护士Vt<400 ml。培训三个月后,STBVM和SB的效率都很高(分别为81%和75%)。培训六个月后,与STBVM(25%)相比,SB的效率有提高的趋势(63%)(p=0.07)。对于STBVM产生Vt>400 ml的情况,无胃充气的情况峰值压力低于有胃充气的情况(7.8 cm H2O对17.7 cm H2O,p=0.0001),且吸气时间有延长的趋势(1.28秒对1.08秒,p=0.08)。在所有使用STBVM的有效通气中,26%的情况Vt>600 ml。

结论

培训六个月后,与STBVM相比,护士使用SB通气至少同样有效。这说明了SB能够弥补技能随时间的退化。另一方面,使用STBVM进行培训时应主要侧重于延长吸气时间,进而提高峰值压力,同时保持足够的Vt。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验