From the Departments of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine.
Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jul;127(1):151-156. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002621.
Manual positive pressure ventilation is an essential skill in a variety of clinical situations. The C&E technique is commonly used with standard facemasks to provide effective ventilation. The Tao mask is a novel design that allows a more ergonomic grip. A seal between the mask and face is made with downward pressure of the palm, centered on the mask, and jaw lift is achieved with 4 fingers centered under the mandible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Tao mask compared to a standard mask before and after the administration of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) using 2 previously established ventilation scales.
One hundred fifty-two patients >18 years of age who were scheduled for general anesthesia were recruited. All care team members were shown a brief instructional video on the use of the Tao mask. After induction of general anesthesia with a standardized protocol, each patient was ventilated with both the standard (Vital Signs #082510) and Tao masks and effectiveness was measured using the Han and Warters scales. This process was repeated after NMB. The sequence of masks was determined with a random-number generator.
Tao mask ventilation scores were significantly better than standard mask scores on both the Han scale and the Warters scale before the administration of NMB (P < .001 for both). Tao mask scores were also significantly better than standard mask scores on the Warters scale after the administration of NMB (P < .001). However, there was no significant difference on the Han scale between the 2 mask types after NMB (P = .180). On the Warters scale, there were significantly fewer patients who were difficult to ventilate with the Tao mask than the standard mask before NMB (18 vs 40; P < .001) and after NMB (8 vs 17; P = .005). No adverse events were reported with either mask.
Our results indicate that the Tao mask demonstrated equivalent safety and superior effectiveness compared to a standard mask. The study design favored the standard mask because all participating practitioners had multiple years of experience with the standard mask and no prior experience with the Tao mask. Since the incidence of inadequate mask ventilation goes up significantly with inexperienced operators, the improved effectiveness of the Tao mask could be even more profound with novice operators.
手动正压通气是各种临床情况下的基本技能。C&E 技术通常与标准面罩一起使用,以提供有效的通气。Tao 面罩是一种新颖的设计,允许更符合人体工程学的握持。通过手掌向下按压面罩中心来实现面罩与面部之间的密封,通过用 4 个手指放在下颌骨下方来实现下颌抬起。本研究的目的是使用两种先前建立的通气量表评估 Tao 面罩与标准面罩在使用神经肌肉阻滞剂 (NMB) 前后的安全性和有效性。
招募了 152 名年龄>18 岁的计划全身麻醉的患者。所有医护人员都观看了关于使用 Tao 面罩的简短教学视频。在使用标准化方案诱导全身麻醉后,每位患者均使用标准 (Vital Signs #082510) 和 Tao 面罩进行通气,并使用 Han 和 Warters 量表测量有效性。在使用 NMB 后重复该过程。面罩的顺序由随机数生成器确定。
在使用 NMB 之前,Tao 面罩通气评分在 Han 量表和 Warters 量表上均明显优于标准面罩评分 (P<0.001,均)。在使用 NMB 后,Tao 面罩评分在 Warters 量表上也明显优于标准面罩评分 (P<0.001)。然而,在使用 NMB 后,2 种面罩类型在 Han 量表上的评分无显著差异 (P=0.180)。在 Warters 量表上,在使用 NMB 之前,使用 Tao 面罩难以通气的患者明显少于使用标准面罩的患者 (18 例比 40 例;P<0.001),在使用 NMB 后,使用 Tao 面罩难以通气的患者也明显少于使用标准面罩的患者 (8 例比 17 例;P=0.005)。两种面罩均未报告不良事件。
我们的结果表明,与标准面罩相比,Tao 面罩具有同等的安全性和更高的有效性。该研究设计有利于标准面罩,因为所有参与的医务人员都具有多年使用标准面罩的经验,而没有使用 Tao 面罩的经验。由于面罩通气不足的发生率在经验不足的操作人员中显着增加,因此 Tao 面罩的改进效果在新手操作人员中可能更加明显。