• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过全髋关节表面置换优化患者选择与治疗效果。

Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing.

作者信息

Schmalzried Thomas P, Silva Mauricio, de la Rosa Mylene A, Choi Eui-Sung, Fowble Vincent A

机构信息

Joint Replacement Institute at Orthopaedic Hospital, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec;441:200-4. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000192354.76792.bb.

DOI:10.1097/01.blo.0000192354.76792.bb
PMID:16331003
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Short-term failures of total hip resurfacing have been related to specific characteristics of the proximal femur. A radiographic arthritic hip grading scale was used to assess four characteristics of the proximal femur: bone density, shape, biomechanics, and focal bone defects. Hips with no unfavorable characteristics were Grade A, hips with one unfavorable characteristic were Grade B, hips with two unfavorable characteristics were Grade C, hips with three unfavorable characteristics were Grade D, and hips with four unfavorable characteristics were Grade F. One hundred forty-seven consecutive hips were treated with metal-on-metal resurfacing by a single surgeon. There were no femoral neck fractures. Of the 91 hips eligible for a minimum 2 year followup, 90% were Grades A or B, 10% were Grade C, and none were Grades D or F. With a minimum 2-year followup, arthritic hip grading was associated with preoperative Harris hip score, occurrence of mild to moderate postoperative pain, preoperative and postoperative range of motion, preoperative and postoperative hip center of rotation, preoperative and postoperative horizontal femoral offset, preoperative and postoperative limb length discrepancy, and acetabular radiolucencies. Hips with a lesser degree of secondary arthritic changes have a higher arthritic hip grade and better outcomes with total hip resurfacing. Relatively strict selection criteria for resurfacing were associated with a low occurrence of short-term failures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, Level II (retrospective study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

未标注

全髋关节表面置换术的短期失败与股骨近端的特定特征有关。使用一种影像学关节炎髋关节分级量表来评估股骨近端的四个特征:骨密度、形状、生物力学和局灶性骨缺损。无不良特征的髋关节为A级,有一个不良特征的髋关节为B级,有两个不良特征的髋关节为C级,有三个不良特征的髋关节为D级,有四个不良特征的髋关节为F级。一位外科医生对147例连续的髋关节进行了金属对金属表面置换术。未发生股骨颈骨折。在91例符合至少2年随访条件的髋关节中,90%为A级或B级,10%为C级,无D级或F级。在至少2年的随访中,关节炎髋关节分级与术前Harris髋关节评分、轻至中度术后疼痛的发生、术前和术后活动范围、术前和术后髋关节旋转中心、术前和术后股骨水平偏移、术前和术后肢体长度差异以及髋臼透光线有关。继发性关节炎改变程度较轻的髋关节关节炎髋关节分级较高,全髋关节表面置换术的效果较好。相对严格的表面置换选择标准与短期失败的低发生率相关。

证据水平

预后研究,II级(回顾性研究)。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。

相似文献

1
Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing.通过全髋关节表面置换优化患者选择与治疗效果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec;441:200-4. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000192354.76792.bb.
2
The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.全髋关节表面置换术的生物力学结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jan;86(1):40-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200401000-00007.
3
Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.金属对金属髋关节表面置换术的临床和影像学结果:至少十年随访。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 17;92(16):2663-71. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01715.
4
One-third of Hips After Periacetabular Osteotomy Survive 30 Years With Good Clinical Results, No Progression of Arthritis, or Conversion to THA.髋臼周围截骨术后三分之一的髋关节在30年时仍保持良好临床效果,无关节炎进展或无需转换为全髋关节置换术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1154-1168. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5169-5.
5
Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.发育性髋关节异常中的股骨形态学:CT三维特征分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1045-1054. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5119-2.
6
Hips With Protrusio Acetabuli Are at Increased Risk for Failure After Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A 10-year Followup.髋臼突出的髋关节在股骨髋臼撞击症手术后失败风险增加:一项10年随访研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2168-80. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4918-9.
7
What Are the Risk Factors for Revision Surgery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at 7-year Followup?髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症7年随访后翻修手术的危险因素有哪些?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1169-1177. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5115-6.
8
The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing.股骨头/颈偏心距与髋关节表面置换术
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jan;89(1):9-15. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B1.18011.
9
Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup.锥形植入物能否成功解决初次全髋关节置换术中的复杂解剖结构问题?早期随访的X线片和髋关节评分
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4480-x.
10
What MRI Findings Predict Failure 10 Years After Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?哪些MRI结果可预测股骨髋臼撞击症手术后10年的失败情况?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1192-1207. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5040-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Hip Replacement or Hip Resurfacing with a Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Acetabular Bearing: A Qualitative and Quantitative Preference Study.采用高交联聚乙烯髋臼衬垫的髋关节置换术或髋关节表面置换术:一项定性与定量偏好研究。
JB JS Open Access. 2020 May 11;5(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00004. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
2
Frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.年轻患者行伯明翰半髋关节表面置换术时频繁出现股骨颈骨溶解。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3770-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4348-0.
3
The outcomes of hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty in Men.
男性中,髋关节表面置换术与标准初次全髋关节置换术的结果比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 May 8;14:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-161.
4
Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system.在地区综合医院进行髋关节表面置换术:使用 ReCap 髋关节表面置换系统的 6 年临床结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Dec 13;13:247. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-247.
5
Is mid-head resection a durable conservative option in the presence of poor femoral bone quality and distorted anatomy?在股骨骨质差和解剖结构变形的情况下,中头部切除是否是一种持久的保守选择?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jun;469(6):1589-97. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1739-0.
6
Does acetabular retroversion affect range of motion after total hip arthroplasty?髋臼后倾是否会影响全髋关节置换术后的活动范围?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1):218-24. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1482-6. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
7
A custom-made guide-wire positioning device for hip surface replacement arthroplasty: description and first results.髋关节表面置换关节成形术定制导丝定位装置:描述和初步结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jul 14;11:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-161.
8
Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision.初次表面髋关节置换术的结果:早期翻修的风险因素评估。
Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):66-71. doi: 10.3109/17453671003685434.
9
Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us?来自国家关节登记处的髋关节表面置换数据:它们告诉了我们什么?它们没有告诉我们什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):351-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1157-3.
10
Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing?患者选择对髋关节表面置换术重要吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jan;467(1):56-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0558-z. Epub 2008 Oct 22.