Döri Ferenc, Arweiler Nicole, Gera István, Sculean Anton
Department of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
J Periodontol. 2005 Dec;76(12):2236-43. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.12.2236.
The purpose of the present study was to compare the healing of deep intrabony defects following treatment with an enamel matrix protein derivative (EMD) combined with either a natural bone mineral (NBM) or beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP).
Twenty-four patients with advanced periodontal disease, each of whom displayed one intrabony defect, were randomly treated with a combination of either EMD + NBM or EMD + beta-TCP. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline and 1 year following therapy.
No differences in any of the investigated parameters were observed at baseline between the two groups. Healing was uneventful in all patients. At 1 year after therapy, the sites treated with EMD + NBM showed a reduction in mean probing depth (PD) from 7.9 +/- 1.0 mm to 3.2 +/- 0.6 mm and a change in mean clinical attachment level (CAL) from 8.8 +/- 1.1 mm to 4.5 +/- 0.6 mm (P < 0.001). In the group treated with EMD + beta-TCP, the mean PD was reduced from 7.8 +/- 1.2 mm to 3.2 +/- 0.9 mm, and the mean CAL changed from 8.8 +/- 1.2 mm to 4.7 +/- 1.2 mm (P < 0.001). In both groups, all sites gained at least 3 mm of CAL. CAL gains of 4 or 5 mm were measured in the majority of the cases (75%), irrespective of treatment modality. No statistically significant differences in terms of PD reductions and CAL gains were observed between the two groups.
Within the limits of the present study, both therapies resulted in significant PD reductions and CAL gains 1 year after surgery.
本研究的目的是比较用釉基质蛋白衍生物(EMD)联合天然骨矿物质(NBM)或β-磷酸三钙(β-TCP)治疗后深部骨内缺损的愈合情况。
24例晚期牙周病患者,每人有一处骨内缺损,随机接受EMD+NBM或EMD+β-TCP联合治疗。在基线和治疗后1年进行临床评估。
两组在基线时所研究的任何参数上均未观察到差异。所有患者愈合过程顺利。治疗后1年,接受EMD+NBM治疗的部位平均探诊深度(PD)从7.9±1.0mm降至3.2±0.6mm,平均临床附着水平(CAL)从8.8±1.1mm变为4.5±0.6mm(P<0.001)。在接受EMD+β-TCP治疗的组中,平均PD从7.8±1.2mm降至3.2±0.9mm,平均CAL从8.8±1.2mm变为4.7±1.2mm(P<0.001)。两组中,所有部位的CAL至少增加了3mm。大多数病例(75%)测量到CAL增加4或5mm,与治疗方式无关。两组之间在PD降低和CAL增加方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。
在本研究的范围内,两种治疗方法在术后1年均导致显著的PD降低和CAL增加。