Wen D Y, Bottini A G, Hall W A, Haines S J
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinic, Minneapolis.
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1992 Apr;3(2):343-54.
Intraventricular antibiotic therapy appears to be a useful treatment modality in those CSF infections in which systemic therapy may fail. Consideration should be given to using this form of treatment when infecting organisms are only sensitive to antibiotics with poor penetration of the CSF (e.g., aminoglycosides and vancomycin) and for cases in which intravenous therapy has failed to sterilize the CSF, toxicity from systemic therapy precludes further increases in dosages, and shunts or other CSF hardware might be expected to reduce the efficacy of systemic therapy by providing a foreign body to harbor organisms. Shunts or reservoirs that are infected may be successfully sterilized with IVT therapy alone or in conjunction with systemic therapy, but this has a lower success rate than cases in which the shunt is removed. There is a wealth of clinical experience with IVT vancomycin and gentamicin that suggests that they are relatively safe. Until more data are available on other aminoglycosides and newer antibiotics, these two agents should be considered the antibiotics of choice for IVT therapy. In situations in which the organism is sensitive to both vancomycin and gentamicin, vancomycin should be used in view of the documented neurotoxicity seen with gentamicin. When gentamicin resistance occurs, amikacin and tobramycin are appropriate alternatives. The high risk of epilepsy with the penicillins and cephalosporins makes them less suited for IVT therapy, although the newer cephalosporins have some promise for IVT therapy. CNS fungal infections can be treated effectively with IVT amphotericin B but with a high risk of significant toxicity. Miconazole appears to be safer than amphotericin B but there is less clinical experience with this drug. Table 1 summarizes the dosages, indications, and toxicity of those antibiotics commonly used for intraventricular administration, which have been reported previously.
对于那些全身治疗可能失败的脑脊液感染,脑室内抗生素治疗似乎是一种有效的治疗方式。当感染病原体仅对脑脊液穿透性差的抗生素(如氨基糖苷类和万古霉素)敏感时,以及静脉治疗未能使脑脊液灭菌、全身治疗的毒性妨碍进一步增加剂量、分流管或其他脑脊液硬件可能因提供异物容纳病原体而预计降低全身治疗效果的情况下,应考虑采用这种治疗形式。被感染的分流管或储液器单独使用脑室内注射疗法或与全身治疗联合使用可能成功灭菌,但这比移除分流管的情况成功率更低。脑室内注射万古霉素和庆大霉素有丰富的临床经验表明它们相对安全。在有更多关于其他氨基糖苷类和新型抗生素的数据之前,这两种药物应被视为脑室内注射疗法的首选抗生素。在病原体对万古霉素和庆大霉素均敏感的情况下,鉴于庆大霉素有记录的神经毒性,应使用万古霉素。当出现庆大霉素耐药时,阿米卡星和妥布霉素是合适的替代药物。青霉素和头孢菌素引发癫痫的高风险使其不太适合脑室内注射疗法,尽管新型头孢菌素在脑室内注射疗法方面有一些前景。中枢神经系统真菌感染可用脑室内注射两性霉素B有效治疗,但有显著毒性的高风险。咪康唑似乎比两性霉素B更安全,但关于这种药物的临床经验较少。表1总结了先前报道的常用于脑室内给药的那些抗生素的剂量、适应证和毒性。