Berencsi Andrea, Ishihara Masami, Imanaka Kuniyasu
Department of Kinesiology, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Ohsawa, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan, and National Institute for Medical Rehabilitation, Budapest, Hungary.
Hum Mov Sci. 2005 Oct-Dec;24(5-6):689-709. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.10.014. Epub 2005 Dec 6.
Three experiments were conducted to investigate the role of central and peripheral vision (CV and PV) in postural control. In Experiment 1, either the central or peripheral visual field were selectively stimulated using a circular random dot pattern that was either static or alternated at 5 Hz. Center of foot pressure (CoP) was used to examine postural sway during quiet standing under both CV and PV conditions. The results showed that, when the visual stimulus was presented in the periphery, the CoP area decreased and more so in the anterior-posterior (AP) than in the medio-lateral (ML) direction, indicating a characteristic directional specificity. There was no significant difference between the static and dynamic (alternating) conditions. Experiment 2 investigated the directional specificity of body sway found in Experiment 1 by having the trunk either be faced toward the stimulus display or perpendicularly to it, with the head always facing the display. The results showed that the stabilizing effect of peripheral vision was present in the direction of stimulus observation (i.e., the head/gaze direction), irrespective of trunk orientation. This suggested that head/gaze direction toward the stimulus presentation, rather than a biomechanical factor like greater mobility of the ankle joint in AP direction than in ML direction, was essential to postural stability. Experiment 3 further examined whether the stabilizing effect of peripheral vision found in Experiments 1 and 2 was caused because more dots (500) were presented as visual cues to the peripheral visual field than to the central visual field (20 dots) by presenting the same number of dots (20) in both conditions. It was found that, in spite of the equal number of dots, the postural sway amplitudes were larger for the central vision conditions than for the peripheral vision conditions. In conclusion, the present study showed that peripheral rather than central vision contributes to maintaining a stable standing posture, with postural sway being influenced more in the direction of stimulus observation, or head/gaze direction, than in the direction of trunk orientation, which suggests that peripheral vision operates primarily in a viewer-centered frame of reference characterized by the head/gaze direction rather than in a body-centered frame of reference characterized by the anatomical planes of the body.
进行了三项实验来研究中央视觉和周边视觉(CV和PV)在姿势控制中的作用。在实验1中,使用静态或以5Hz交替的圆形随机点图案选择性地刺激中央或周边视野。在CV和PV条件下安静站立时,使用足底压力中心(CoP)来检查姿势晃动。结果表明,当视觉刺激出现在周边时,CoP面积减小,并且在前后(AP)方向上比在内外侧(ML)方向上减小得更多,表明具有特征性的方向特异性。静态和动态(交替)条件之间没有显著差异。实验2通过使躯干要么面向刺激显示器要么与之垂直,且头部始终面向显示器,研究了实验1中发现的身体晃动的方向特异性。结果表明,无论躯干方向如何,周边视觉的稳定作用都存在于刺激观察方向(即头部/注视方向)。这表明朝向刺激呈现的头部/注视方向,而非像踝关节在AP方向比在ML方向具有更大活动性这样的生物力学因素,对姿势稳定性至关重要。实验3通过在两种条件下呈现相同数量的点(20个),进一步研究了实验1和2中发现的周边视觉的稳定作用是否是因为呈现给周边视野的视觉线索点(500个)比呈现给中央视野的点(20个)更多所致。结果发现,尽管点数相等,但中央视觉条件下的姿势晃动幅度比周边视觉条件下更大。总之,本研究表明,维持稳定站立姿势的是周边视觉而非中央视觉,姿势晃动在刺激观察方向或头部/注视方向上比在躯干方向上受到的影响更大,这表明周边视觉主要在以头部/注视方向为特征的观察者中心参照系中起作用,而非在以身体解剖平面为特征的身体中心参照系中起作用。