Cadoni Gabriella, Picciotti Pasqualina Maria, Rolesi Rolando, Sulfaro Marco, Guidobaldi Margherita, Amore Filippo, Conti Guido, Paludetti Gaetano, Turco Simona
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Institute of Otolaryngology, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
National Center for Services and Research for the Prevention of Blindness and Rehabilitation of the Visually Impaired, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 13;12(10):1709. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101709.
Although vision loss is known to affect equilibrium maintenance, postural control in patients affected by low vision has been poorly investigated. We evaluated postural stability and the ability to use visual, proprioceptive and vestibular information in different low vision patterns. Ten adults with normal vision (NC), fourteen adults affected by central visual impairment (CLV) and eight adults affected by peripheral visual impairment (PLV) were enrolled in our study. Patients underwent visual, vestibular and postural evaluation (bedside examination, Computed Dynamic Posturograophy). Motor Control Tests were performed to analyze automatic postural adaptive responses elicited by unexpected postural disturbances. Clinical evaluations did not show abnormality in all patients. In the Sensory Organization Test, CLV and PLV patients performed more poorly in conditions 3-6 and 3-4, as compared to NC subjects. The condition 5 score was significantly lower in the CLV group with respect to the PLV patients. Composite equilibrium scores demonstrated significant differences between low-vision subjects vs. NC subjects. No differences were found for somatosensorial contribution. Visual afferences showed lower values in all visually impaired subjects, while vestibular contribution was lower in the CLV patients as compared to the NC and PLV patients. MCT latencies were significantly worse in the CLV subjects. In the low-vision patients, postural control was modified with a specific pattern of strategy adaptation. Different modulations of postural control and different adaptive responses seemed to characterize CLV patients as compared to PLV subjects.
尽管已知视力丧失会影响平衡维持,但对低视力患者的姿势控制研究甚少。我们评估了不同低视力模式下的姿势稳定性以及使用视觉、本体感觉和前庭信息的能力。10名视力正常的成年人(NC)、14名受中央视力损害的成年人(CLV)和8名受周边视力损害的成年人(PLV)参与了我们的研究。患者接受了视觉、前庭和姿势评估(床边检查、计算机动态姿势描记法)。进行了运动控制测试,以分析由意外姿势干扰引发的自动姿势适应性反应。临床评估显示所有患者均无异常。在感觉组织测试中,与NC组受试者相比,CLV组和PLV组患者在条件3 - 6和3 - 4下表现更差。CLV组的条件5得分相对于PLV组患者显著更低。综合平衡得分显示低视力受试者与NC组受试者之间存在显著差异。本体感觉贡献方面未发现差异。所有视力受损受试者的视觉传入值均较低,而与NC组和PLV组患者相比,CLV组患者的前庭贡献较低。CLV组受试者的MCT潜伏期明显更差。在低视力患者中,姿势控制通过特定的策略适应模式进行了调整。与PLV组受试者相比,CLV组患者似乎具有不同的姿势控制调制和不同的适应性反应特征。