• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从撒哈拉以南非洲人的多样性角度看史前马拉维人的颅骨形态特征。

Morphometric cranial identity of prehistoric Malawians in the light of sub-Saharan African diversity.

作者信息

Morris Alan G, Ribot Isabelle

机构信息

Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa.

出版信息

Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 May;130(1):10-25. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20308.

DOI:10.1002/ajpa.20308
PMID:16345069
Abstract

Little has been described of the Holocene populations of South-Central Africa, despite the region demonstrating major subsistence shifts relating to dispersals of agriculturalists at least 2,000 years ago. Seven sites with associated human skeletal remains were selected. Hora, Chencherere, Fingura, and Mtuzi represent the Middle Holocene (2,000-5,000 years ago), and Phwadze, Mtemankhokwe, and Nkudzi Bay represent the Late Holocene and the arrival of agriculturalists between 500-2,000 years ago. Focusing on the identity of Hora and Chencherere specimens, two questions were addressed: are the various Holocene Malawians similar to each other, or do they suggest morphological change over time? What modern populations are closest to the prehistoric specimens? The archaeological sample was compared to modern sub-Saharan Africans from four regions, plus a historic Khoi-San foraging group. Factor analyses were performed in order to identify complex patterns of variation in metric traits of the skull. According to the results, prehistoric Malawians showed only slight differences between the Late and Middle Holocene, suggesting a population change without any major discontinuity. Later Stone Age skulls did not exclusively show similarities with the Khoi-San, as they frequently fit well within the variation of modern Bantu-speaking groups, especially West-Central Africa. Therefore, we reject the hypothesis that Middle Holocene South-Central Africans have an exclusively Khoi-San ancestry, and support an alternative hypothesis that both Middle and Late Holocene groups share a common biological heritage originating in West-Central Africa in earlier times.

摘要

尽管中南非洲地区至少在2000年前就因农业群体的扩散而出现了重大的生计转变,但关于全新世时期该地区人口的描述却很少。我们选择了七个有相关人类骨骼遗骸的遗址。霍拉、陈切雷雷、芬古拉和姆图齐代表中全新世(2000 - 5000年前),普瓦德泽、姆特曼霍克韦和恩库齐湾代表晚全新世以及500 - 2000年前农业群体的到来。聚焦于霍拉和陈切雷雷标本的身份,我们探讨了两个问题:不同的全新世马拉维人彼此相似吗,还是他们暗示了随时间的形态变化?哪些现代人群与史前标本最为接近?我们将考古样本与来自四个地区的现代撒哈拉以南非洲人以及一个历史时期的科伊 - 桑觅食群体进行了比较。进行了因子分析,以识别头骨测量特征的复杂变异模式。根据结果,史前马拉维人在晚全新世和中全新世之间仅显示出细微差异,表明人口有变化但没有任何重大间断。晚石器时代的头骨并非只与科伊 - 桑人有相似之处,因为它们常常很好地符合现代说班图语群体的变异范围,尤其是中西部非洲群体。因此,我们拒绝中全新世中南非洲人完全具有科伊 - 桑人血统的假设,并支持另一种假设,即中全新世和晚全新世群体都共享一个起源于早期中西部非洲的共同生物遗产。

相似文献

1
Morphometric cranial identity of prehistoric Malawians in the light of sub-Saharan African diversity.从撒哈拉以南非洲人的多样性角度看史前马拉维人的颅骨形态特征。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 May;130(1):10-25. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20308.
2
Modern human cranial diversity in the Late Pleistocene of Africa and Eurasia: evidence from Nazlet Khater, Peştera cu Oase, and Hofmeyr.非洲和欧亚大陆晚更新世现代人类颅骨多样性:来自纳兹莱特·哈特、奥塞洞穴和霍夫迈尔的证据。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009 Oct;140(2):347-58. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21080.
3
Human cranial diversity and evidence for an ancient lineage of modern humans.人类颅骨多样性及现代人类古老世系的证据。
J Hum Evol. 2008 Jun;54(6):814-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.10.010. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
4
Throwing in the Middle and Upper Paleolithic: inferences from an analysis of humeral retroversion.旧石器时代中期和晚期的投掷行为:基于肱骨后倾分析的推断
J Hum Evol. 2009 Jan;56(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.08.022. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
5
Metric and non-metric randomization methods, geographic variation, and the single-species hypothesis for Asian and African Homo erectus.公制和非公制随机化方法、地理变异以及亚洲和非洲直立人的单物种假说。
J Hum Evol. 2005 Dec;49(6):680-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.07.005. Epub 2005 Oct 3.
6
Pleistocene Homo sapiens from Middle Awash, Ethiopia.来自埃塞俄比亚中阿瓦什地区的更新世智人。
Nature. 2003 Jun 12;423(6941):742-7. doi: 10.1038/nature01669.
7
The position of the Nazlet Khater specimen among prehistoric and modern African and Levantine populations.纳兹莱特·哈特样本在史前及现代非洲和黎凡特人群中的位置。
J Hum Evol. 2000 Sep;39(3):269-88. doi: 10.1006/jhev.2000.0421.
8
Early Holocene human skeletal remains from Sumidouro Cave, Lagoa Santa, Brazil: history of discoveries, geological and chronological context, and comparative cranial morphology.巴西拉戈阿圣塔苏米杜罗洞穴的全新世早期人类骨骼遗骸:发现历史、地质与年代背景以及颅骨形态比较
J Hum Evol. 2007 Jan;52(1):16-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.07.012. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
9
A critical review of the German Paleolithic hominin record.对德国旧石器时代人类记录的批判性综述。
J Hum Evol. 2006 Dec;51(6):551-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.014. Epub 2006 Jul 25.
10
Modern human ancestry at the peripheries: a test of the replacement theory.边缘地区的现代人类祖先:对替代理论的检验
Science. 2001 Jan 12;291(5502):293-7. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5502.293.

引用本文的文献

1
BaTwa populations from Zambia retain ancestry of past hunter-gatherer groups.赞比亚的巴图瓦人群保留了过去狩猎采集群体的祖先。
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 24;15(1):7307. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50733-y.
2
A Late Holocene community burial area: Evidence of diverse mortuary practices in the Western Cape, South Africa.一个全新世晚期的社区埋葬区:南非西开普省多样化丧葬习俗的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0230391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230391. eCollection 2020.
3
Reconstructing Prehistoric African Population Structure.重建史前非洲人口结构。
Cell. 2017 Sep 21;171(1):59-71.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.049.