Macera C A, Sun R K, Yeager K K, Brandes D A
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 May;40(5):479-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb02015.x.
To evaluate the extent to which mortality data, which is often used to track secular trends for specific diseases, underestimates the prevalence of dementia.
Retrospective analysis of existing data.
Department of Mental Health inpatient facilities in South Carolina.
Inpatients at Department of Mental Health facilities who were listed in the South Carolina Statewide Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Registry and who died between 1988 and 1990 (n = 450).
Sensitivity and specificity of dementia diagnoses on death certificates compared to medical record diagnoses for inpatients with a pre-mortem dementia diagnosis.
Twenty-three percent of death certificates contained any dementia diagnosis (104/450). The sensitivity of death certificates varied by type of dementia (28 percent for Alzheimer's disease; 8 percent for multi-infarct dementia) as well as by race, sex, and age.
Mortality statistics substantially underestimate the prevalence of dementing illnesses and do not fully represent the public health burden of dementia.
评估常用于追踪特定疾病长期趋势的死亡率数据在多大程度上低估了痴呆症的患病率。
对现有数据进行回顾性分析。
南卡罗来纳州心理健康住院设施部门。
列入南卡罗来纳州全州阿尔茨海默病及相关疾病登记处且于1988年至1990年间死亡的心理健康设施住院患者(n = 450)。
与生前诊断为痴呆症的住院患者病历诊断相比,死亡证明上痴呆症诊断的敏感性和特异性。
23%的死亡证明包含任何痴呆症诊断(104/450)。死亡证明的敏感性因痴呆症类型(阿尔茨海默病为28%;多发性梗死性痴呆为8%)以及种族、性别和年龄而异。
死亡率统计数据大幅低估了痴呆症疾病的患病率,并未充分反映痴呆症的公共卫生负担。