Jorm A F, Henderson A S, Jacomb P A
NH&MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Australian National University, Canberra.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1989 Feb;79(2):179-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1989.tb08585.x.
Australian death certificate data were analysed to determine whether they can provide useful information on regional differences in the prevalence of dementia. Strong differences between the Australian states were found in the prevalence of dementing disorders at death. However, evidence indicated that death certification practices influenced the prevalence rates found: a) the reported prevalence of various dementing disorders at death has changed greatly over quite a short period; b) the prevalence of dementing disorders at death was more strongly influenced by place of death than by place of birth; and c) the differences between states were a result of very high rates in particular regions which, in one case, could be traced to the death certification practices of a single medical practitioner. It is concluded that death certificate data are not useful for investigating regional differences in the prevalence of dementia.
对澳大利亚死亡证明数据进行了分析,以确定这些数据是否能提供有关痴呆症患病率地区差异的有用信息。研究发现,澳大利亚各州在死亡时痴呆症障碍的患病率存在显著差异。然而,有证据表明,死亡证明的开具方式影响了所发现的患病率:a)在相当短的时间内,报告的各种痴呆症障碍在死亡时的患病率发生了很大变化;b)死亡时痴呆症障碍的患病率受死亡地点的影响比受出生地点的影响更大;c)各州之间的差异是由于特定地区的患病率极高,在一个案例中,这可以追溯到一名医生的死亡证明开具做法。研究得出结论,死亡证明数据对于调查痴呆症患病率的地区差异并无用处。