Center of Marine Biotechnology, Maryland Biotechnology Institute, University of Maryland, 600 East Lombard Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Jan;59(1):47-51. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.1.47-51.1993.
Clostridium perfringens in sediment samples collected at the Deep Water Municipal Sewage Sludge Disposal Site (also called the 106-Mile Site), off the coast of New Jersey, was enumerated. The counts of C. perfringens found in sediment samples collected within and to the southwest of the 106-Mile Site were significantly elevated (P < 0.01) compared with counts of samples from reference stations of similar depth (2,400 to 2,700 m), topography, and distance from the continental shelf, indicating that the benthic environment was contaminated by sewage dumping at this site. Low counts of C. perfringens in sediment samples collected at stations between the base of the continental shelf and the 106-Mile Site indicated that coastal runoff was not a significant source of contamination. Elevated counts were observed for samples up to 92 km to the southwest, whereas low counts were obtained for samples from stations to the east of the 106-Mile Site. This distribution is consistent with previous model predictions of sludge deposition. In areas heavily impacted by sludge dumping, C. perfringens counts were generally highest in the top 1 cm of sediment and exceeded 9,000 CFU g (dry weight) of sediment. The patterns of C. perfringens dispersal observed in this study have proved useful for selection of heavily impacted areas and control stations for further ecological evaluation by a multidisciplinary research team.
在新泽西州沿海的深水城市污水处理污泥处置场(也称为 106 英里处置场)采集的沉积物样本中,对产气荚膜梭菌进行了计数。与类似深度(2400 至 2700 米)、地形和距大陆架距离的参考站位的样本相比,在 106 英里处置场内部和西南采集的沉积物样本中发现的产气荚膜梭菌数量明显升高(P < 0.01),表明该底栖环境受到该处置场污水倾倒的污染。在大陆架底部和 106 英里处置场之间的站位采集的沉积物样本中,产气荚膜梭菌数量较低,表明沿海径流不是污染的重要来源。在西南方向 92 公里范围内的样本中观察到数量升高,而在 106 英里处置场以东的站位样本中获得的数量较低。这种分布与之前对污泥沉积的模型预测一致。在受到污泥倾倒严重影响的地区,产气荚膜梭菌数量通常在沉积物的前 1 厘米最高,超过 9000 CFU g(干重)的沉积物。本研究中观察到的产气荚膜梭菌扩散模式对于选择受影响严重的地区和控制站进行多学科研究小组的进一步生态评估非常有用。