• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境管理中达成共识与协商的形式化模型。

A formal model for consensus and negotiation in environmental management.

作者信息

Regan Helen M, Colyvan Mark, Markovchick-Nicholls Lisa

机构信息

Biology Department, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-4614, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2006 Jul;80(2):167-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.004. Epub 2005 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.004
PMID:16359778
Abstract

Environmental management decisions typically lie at the interface of science and public policy. Consequently, these decisions involve a number of stakeholders with competing agendas and vested interests in the ultimate decision. In such cases, it is appropriate to adopt formal methods for consensus building to ensure transparent and repeatable decisions. In this paper, we use an environmental management case study to demonstrate the utility of a mathematical consensus convergence model in aggregating values (or weights) across groups. Consensus models are applicable when all parties agree to negotiate in order to resolve conflict. The advantage of this method is that it does not require that all members of the group reach agreement, often an impossible task in group decision making. Instead, it uses philosophical foundations in consensus building to aggregate group members' values in a way that guarantees convergence towards a single consensual value that summarizes the group position. We highlight current problems with ad hoc consensus and negotiation methods, provide justification for the adoption of formal consensus convergence models and compare the consensus convergence model with currently used methods for aggregating values across a group in a decision making context. The model provides a simple and transparent decision support tool for group decision making that is straightforward to implement.

摘要

环境管理决策通常处于科学与公共政策的交叉点。因此,这些决策涉及众多利益相关者,他们有着相互冲突的议程以及在最终决策中的既得利益。在这种情况下,采用正式的共识达成方法以确保决策的透明性和可重复性是恰当的。在本文中,我们通过一个环境管理案例研究来展示一种数学共识收敛模型在汇总不同群体的价值观(或权重)方面的效用。当所有各方都同意通过协商来解决冲突时,共识模型就适用。这种方法的优点在于它并不要求群体的所有成员都达成一致,而在群体决策中这往往是一项不可能完成的任务。相反,它利用共识达成过程中的哲学基础,以一种保证朝着一个总结群体立场的单一共识值收敛的方式汇总群体成员的价值观。我们强调了当前临时共识和协商方法存在的问题,为采用正式的共识收敛模型提供了理由,并在决策背景下将共识收敛模型与当前用于汇总群体价值观的方法进行了比较。该模型为群体决策提供了一个简单且透明的决策支持工具,易于实施。

相似文献

1
A formal model for consensus and negotiation in environmental management.环境管理中达成共识与协商的形式化模型。
J Environ Manage. 2006 Jul;80(2):167-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.004. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
2
Framework for use of toxicity screening tools in context-based decision-making.在基于背景的决策中使用毒性筛选工具的框架。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 May;45(5):759-96. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.10.025. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
3
What can decision analysis do for invasive species management?决策分析在入侵物种管理中能起到什么作用?
Risk Anal. 2004 Aug;24(4):859-68. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00484.x.
4
Supporting multi-stakeholder environmental decisions.支持多方利益相关者的环境决策。
J Environ Manage. 2008 Sep;88(4):607-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.020. Epub 2007 May 3.
5
A decision support tool to prioritize risk management options for contaminated sites.用于优先考虑污染场地风险管理选项的决策支持工具。
Sci Total Environ. 2010 Mar 15;408(8):1786-99. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.12.026. Epub 2010 Feb 7.
6
Uses and misuses of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making.多标准决策分析(MCDA)在环境决策中的应用与滥用
Risk Anal. 2009 Jan;29(1):26-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01130.x. Epub 2008 Sep 29.
7
Life cycle based risk assessment of recycled materials in roadway construction.道路建设中再生材料基于生命周期的风险评估。
Waste Manag. 2007;27(10):1458-64. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.03.007. Epub 2007 May 17.
8
Use of advances in technology for maritime risk assessment.利用技术进步进行海上风险评估。
Risk Anal. 2004 Aug;24(4):1041-63. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00506.x.
9
The role of environmental accidental risk assessment in the process of granting development consent.环境意外风险评估在授予开发同意书过程中的作用。
Risk Anal. 2009 Nov;29(11):1601-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01285.x. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
10
Degradation model: a quantitative EIA instrument, acting as a decision support system (DSS) for environmental management.降解模型:一种定量酶免疫分析仪器,用作环境管理的决策支持系统(DSS)。
Environ Manage. 2002 Jul;30(1):151-6. doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-2647-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Ranking ecosystem services delivered by trees in urban and rural areas.城乡树木提供的生态系统服务排名。
Ambio. 2022 Sep;51(9):2043-2057. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01722-2. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
2
Setting population-size targets for geese causing socio-economic conflicts.设定导致社会经济冲突的鹅类种群数量目标。
Ambio. 2022 Jan;51(1):209-225. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01539-5. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
The Fortune of the Commons: Participatory Evaluation of Small-Scale Fisheries in the Brazilian Amazon.公有资源的命运:巴西亚马逊地区小规模渔业的参与式评估
Environ Manage. 2016 May;57(5):1009-23. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0660-z. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
4
Approach of decision making based on the analytic hierarchy process for urban landscape management.基于层次分析法的城市景观管理决策方法。
Environ Manage. 2013 Mar;51(3):777-85. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9990-7. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
5
Multidimensional evaluation of managed relocation.管理式迁移的多维评估
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 16;106(24):9721-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902327106. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
6
Assessing and prioritizing ecological communities for monitoring in a regional habitat conservation plan.在区域栖息地保护计划中评估生态群落并确定监测的优先级。
Environ Manage. 2008 Jul;42(1):165-79. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9109-3. Epub 2008 Apr 10.