Curry Alan, Appleton Hazel, Dowsett Barry
Health Protection Agency, Clinical Sciences Building, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Micron. 2006;37(2):91-106. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2005.10.001. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
Transmission electron microscopy has had a profound impact on our knowledge and understanding of viruses and bacteria. The 1000-fold improvement in resolution provided by electron microscopy (EM) has allowed visualization of viruses, the existence of which had previously only been suspected as the causative agents of transmissible infectious disease. Viruses are grouped into families based on their morphology. Viruses from different families look different and these morphological variances are the basis for identification of viruses by EM. Electron microscopy initially came to prominence in diagnostic microbiology in the late 1960s when it was used in the rapid diagnosis of smallpox, by differentiating, on a morphological basis, poxviruses from the less problematic herpesviruses in skin lesions. Subsequently, the technique was employed in the diagnosis of other viral infections, such as hepatitis B and parvovirus B19. Electron microscopy has led to the discovery of many new viruses, most notably the various viruses associated with gastroenteritis, for which it remained the principal diagnostic method until fairly recent times. Development of molecular techniques, which offer greater sensitivity and often the capacity to easily process large numbers of samples, has replaced EM in many areas of diagnostic virology. Hence the role of EM in clinical virology is evolving with less emphasis on diagnosis and more on research, although this is likely only to be undertaken in specialist centres. However, EM still offers tremendous advantages to the microbiologist, both in the speed of diagnosis and the potential for detecting, by a single test, any viral pathogen or even multiple pathogens present within a sample. There is continuing use of EM for the investigation of new and emerging agents, such as SARS and human monkeypox virus. Furthermore, EM forms a vital part of the national emergency response programme of many countries and will provide a frontline diagnostic service in the event of a bioterrorism incident, particularly in the scenario of a deliberate release of smallpox virus. In the field of bacteriology, EM is of little use diagnostically, although some bacterial pathogens can be identified in biopsy material processed for EM examination. Electron microscopy has been used, however, to elucidate the structure and function of many bacterial features, such as flagellae, fimbriae and spores and in the study of bacteriophages. The combined use of EM and gold-labelled antibodies provides a powerful tool for the ultrastructural localisation of bacterial and viral antigens.
透射电子显微镜对我们认识和理解病毒及细菌产生了深远影响。电子显微镜(EM)提供的分辨率提高了1000倍,使得病毒得以可视化,而此前病毒仅被怀疑是可传播传染病的病原体。病毒根据其形态被分为不同的科。来自不同科的病毒外观不同,这些形态差异是通过电子显微镜鉴定病毒的基础。电子显微镜最初在20世纪60年代末在诊断微生物学中崭露头角,当时它被用于天花的快速诊断,通过在形态学基础上区分皮肤损伤中的痘病毒和问题较小的疱疹病毒。随后,该技术被用于诊断其他病毒感染,如乙型肝炎和细小病毒B19。电子显微镜导致发现了许多新病毒,最显著的是与肠胃炎相关的各种病毒,直到最近它仍是诊断这些病毒的主要方法。分子技术的发展提供了更高的灵敏度,并且通常能够轻松处理大量样本,在诊断病毒学的许多领域已取代了电子显微镜。因此,电子显微镜在临床病毒学中的作用正在演变,对诊断的重视减少,更多地转向研究,尽管这可能仅在专业中心进行。然而,电子显微镜仍然为微生物学家提供了巨大优势,无论是在诊断速度方面,还是在通过单次检测检测样本中存在的任何病毒病原体甚至多种病原体的潜力方面。电子显微镜仍在持续用于调查新出现的病原体,如严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)和人类猴痘病毒。此外,电子显微镜是许多国家国家应急响应计划的重要组成部分,在发生生物恐怖主义事件时,特别是在故意释放天花病毒的情况下,将提供一线诊断服务。在细菌学领域,电子显微镜在诊断方面用处不大,尽管在用于电子显微镜检查的活检材料中可以鉴定出一些细菌病原体。然而,电子显微镜已被用于阐明许多细菌特征的结构和功能,如鞭毛、菌毛和芽孢,并用于噬菌体研究。电子显微镜与金标抗体的联合使用为细菌和病毒抗原的超微结构定位提供了强大工具。