• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭与学校联合预防性综合干预措施的随机研究:对饮酒起始、规律饮酒及每周醉酒情况的长期影响模式

Randomized study of combined universal family and school preventive interventions: patterns of long-term effects on initiation, regular use, and weekly drunkenness.

作者信息

Spoth Richard, Randall G Kevin, Shin Chungyeol, Redmond Cleve

机构信息

Partnerships in Prevention Science Institute, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2005 Dec;19(4):372-81. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.19.4.372.

DOI:10.1037/0893-164X.19.4.372
PMID:16366809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2409287/
Abstract

This study reports findings on a combined family and school-based competency-training intervention from an in-school assessment 2.5 years past baseline, as a follow-up to an earlier study of substance initiation. Increased rates of observed alcohol use and an additional wave of data allowed evaluation of regular alcohol use and weekly drunkenness, with both point-in-time and growth curve analyses. Thirty-six rural schools were randomly assigned to (a) a combined family and school intervention condition, (b) a school-only condition, or (c) a control condition. The earlier significant outcome on a substance initiation index was replicated, and positive point-in-time results for weekly drunkenness were observed, but there were no statistically significant outcomes for regular alcohol use. Discussion focuses on factors relevant to the mix of significant longitudinal results within a consistent general pattern of positive intervention-control differences.

摘要

本研究报告了一项基于家庭和学校的综合能力培训干预措施的研究结果,该研究是在基线后2.5年进行的校内评估,作为早期物质使用起始研究的后续研究。观察到的酒精使用率增加以及额外的一波数据使得能够对经常饮酒和每周醉酒情况进行评估,同时采用了时间点分析和增长曲线分析。36所农村学校被随机分配到(a)家庭和学校联合干预组、(b)仅学校干预组或(c)对照组。物质使用起始指数的早期显著结果得到了重复,并且观察到了每周醉酒情况的积极时间点结果,但经常饮酒方面没有统计学上的显著结果。讨论集中在与积极干预 - 对照差异的一致总体模式内显著纵向结果组合相关的因素上。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db44/2409287/b90222656793/nihms-9969-0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db44/2409287/a42b97ca1b4f/nihms-9969-0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db44/2409287/059652e7234d/nihms-9969-0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db44/2409287/b90222656793/nihms-9969-0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db44/2409287/a42b97ca1b4f/nihms-9969-0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db44/2409287/059652e7234d/nihms-9969-0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db44/2409287/b90222656793/nihms-9969-0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Randomized study of combined universal family and school preventive interventions: patterns of long-term effects on initiation, regular use, and weekly drunkenness.家庭与学校联合预防性综合干预措施的随机研究:对饮酒起始、规律饮酒及每周醉酒情况的长期影响模式
Psychol Addict Behav. 2005 Dec;19(4):372-81. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.19.4.372.
2
Substance use outcomes 51/2 years past baseline for partnership-based, family-school preventive interventions.基于伙伴关系的家庭-学校预防干预措施在基线后5.5年的物质使用结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jul 1;96(1-2):57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.023. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
3
Replicating and extending a model of effects of universal preventive intervention during early adolescence on young adult substance misuse.复制并扩展一项关于青少年早期普遍预防干预对青年期物质滥用影响的模型。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Oct;84(10):913-21. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000131. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
4
Reduction of adolescent alcohol use through family-school intervention: a randomized trial.通过家校干预减少青少年饮酒:一项随机试验。
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Dec;53(6):778-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
5
Longitudinal substance initiation outcomes for a universal preventive intervention combining family and school programs.一项结合家庭和学校项目的通用预防干预措施的纵向物质使用起始结果。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2002 Jun;16(2):129-34.
6
Family, school, peer and individual influences on early adolescent alcohol use: first-year impact of the Resilient Families programme.家庭、学校、同伴及个人因素对青少年早期饮酒行为的影响:韧性家庭项目的第一年影响
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007 Nov;26(6):625-34. doi: 10.1080/09595230701613817.
7
Alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family-focused preventive interventions: one- and two-year follow-ups of a controlled study.以家庭为重点的普遍预防干预措施的酒精使用起始结果:一项对照研究的一年和两年随访
J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 1999 Mar;13:103-11. doi: 10.15288/jsas.1999.s13.103.
8
Preventing heavy alcohol use in adolescents (PAS): cluster randomized trial of a parent and student intervention offered separately and simultaneously.预防青少年重度饮酒(PAS):对分别和同时提供给家长和学生的干预措施进行的群组随机试验。
Addiction. 2009 Oct;104(10):1669-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02677.x.
9
Risk moderation of a parent and student preventive alcohol intervention by adolescent and family factors: a cluster randomized trial.青少年和家庭因素对父母和学生预防酒精干预的风险调节:一项聚类随机试验。
Prev Med. 2014 Mar;60:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.12.027. Epub 2013 Dec 29.
10
A cluster randomized trial on the effects of a parent and student intervention on alcohol use in adolescents four years after baseline; no evidence of catching-up behavior.一项针对父母和学生干预对青少年饮酒行为影响的整群随机试验,在基线 4 年后没有发现追赶行为的证据。
Addict Behav. 2013 Apr;38(4):2032-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.12.013. Epub 2012 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Fadeout and persistence of intervention impacts on social-emotional and cognitive skills in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials.干预对儿童和青少年社会情感和认知技能的影响的淡出和持续:随机对照试验的荟萃分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2024 Oct;150(10):1207-1236. doi: 10.1037/bul0000450.
2
Pilot Implementation of Guiando Buenas Decisiones, an Evidence-Based Parenting Program for Spanish-Speaking Families, in Pediatric Primary Care in a Large, U.S. Health System: A Qualitative Interview Study.《基于证据的育儿计划 Guiando Buenas Decisiones 在大型美国医疗体系中的儿科初级保健中西班牙语裔家庭的初步实施:定性访谈研究》。
J Prev (2022). 2024 Dec;45(6):901-918. doi: 10.1007/s10935-024-00796-w. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
3
Academic Performance and Peer or Parental Tobacco Use among Non-Smoking Adolescents: Influence of Smoking Interactions on Intention to Smoke.非吸烟青少年的学业成绩与同伴或父母的吸烟行为:吸烟相互作用对吸烟意向的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 6;20(2):1048. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021048.
4
Randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of a brief, communication-based, substance use preventive intervention for parents of adolescents: Protocol for the SUPPER Project (Substance Use Prevention Promoted by Eating family meals Regularly).随机对照试验测试基于沟通的简短物质使用预防干预措施对青少年父母的效果:SUPPER 项目(通过定期家庭用餐促进物质使用预防)方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0263016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263016. eCollection 2022.
5
Family-centered alcohol use prevention for African American adolescents: A randomized clinical trial.以家庭为中心的针对非裔美国青少年的酒精使用预防:一项随机临床试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Dec;87(12):1085-1092. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000448. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
6
Family-based prevention programmes for alcohol use in young people.针对年轻人饮酒问题的家庭预防计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 19;3(3):CD012287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012287.pub2.
7
The Effectiveness of Psychosocial Interventions Delivered by Teachers in Schools: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.教师在学校开展的心理社会干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2017 Sep;20(3):333-350. doi: 10.1007/s10567-017-0235-4.
8
Testing a Brief Substance Misuse Preventive Intervention for Parents of Pre-Adolescents: Feasibility, Acceptability, Preliminary Efficacy.对青春期前儿童家长进行简短物质滥用预防干预的测试:可行性、可接受性、初步疗效。
J Child Fam Stud. 2016 Dec;25(12):3739-3748. doi: 10.1007/s10826-016-0525-3. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
9
Replicating and extending a model of effects of universal preventive intervention during early adolescence on young adult substance misuse.复制并扩展一项关于青少年早期普遍预防干预对青年期物质滥用影响的模型。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Oct;84(10):913-21. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000131. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
10
Effective Parenting Interventions to Reduce Youth Substance Use: A Systematic Review.减少青少年药物使用的有效育儿干预措施:一项系统综述
Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4425.

本文引用的文献

1
A home-based prevention program for sixth-grade alcohol use: Results from project Northland.一项针对六年级学生饮酒问题的家庭预防项目:北国项目的结果。
J Prim Prev. 1995 Dec;16(2):125-47. doi: 10.1007/BF02407336.
2
Toward a comprehensive strategy for effective practitioner-scientist partnerships and larger-scale community health and well-being.迈向实现有效临床医生-科学家合作以及更大规模社区健康与福祉的全面战略。
Am J Community Psychol. 2005 Jun;35(3-4):107-26. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-3388-0.
3
Brief family intervention effects on adolescent substance initiation: school-level growth curve analyses 6 years following baseline.简短家庭干预对青少年物质使用初发的影响:基线后6年的学校层面增长曲线分析
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Jun;72(3):535-42. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.535.
4
The Strong African American Families Program: translating research into prevention programming.强大非裔美国家庭项目:将研究转化为预防方案
Child Dev. 2004 May-Jun;75(3):900-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00713.x.
5
Definitions of drunkenness.醉酒的定义。
Subst Use Misuse. 2003 Jul;38(9):1285-303. doi: 10.1081/ja-120018485.
6
Field assessment of BAC data to study late-night college drinking.用于研究深夜大学生饮酒情况的血液酒精浓度(BAC)数据的现场评估。
J Stud Alcohol. 2003 May;64(3):322-30. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2003.64.322.
7
Effects of a preventive intervention on adolescent substance use initiation, expectancies, and refusal intentions.一项预防性干预措施对青少年物质使用起始、预期及拒绝意图的影响。
Prev Sci. 2003 Jun;4(2):109-22. doi: 10.1023/a:1022926332514.
8
Cultural sensitivity and adaptation in family-based prevention interventions.基于家庭的预防干预中的文化敏感性与适应性。
Prev Sci. 2002 Sep;3(3):241-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1019902902119.
9
Longitudinal substance initiation outcomes for a universal preventive intervention combining family and school programs.一项结合家庭和学校项目的通用预防干预措施的纵向物质使用起始结果。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2002 Jun;16(2):129-34.
10
Universal family-focused interventions in alcohol-use disorder prevention: cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of two interventions.酒精使用障碍预防中以家庭为中心的通用干预措施:两种干预措施的成本效益分析和成本效益分析
J Stud Alcohol. 2002 Mar;63(2):219-28. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2002.63.219.