Baucom D H, Sanders B S
Dept. of Psychology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1978 Aug;42(4):378-84. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4204_8.
The relationship between feminism and sex roles was explored in two studies. In female college students, sex-role types were measured by Baucom's (1976) MSC and FMN scales and by Bem's Sex-Role Inventory (Bem, 1974). Feminism was measured by the Attitude Toward Women Scale (AWS, Short Form) (Spence & Helmreich, 1972) and the Women's Liberation Scale (WLS) (Goldberg, 1976). Two groups of women were predicted to be more profeminist than others. (a) those scoring high on both masculinity and femininity and (b) those scoring high on masculinity and low on femininity. Results of the study supported both hypotheses using the AWS but not the WLS. In the second study, MSC and FMN served as the basis for forming sex-role types, and feminism was measured by participation in NOW. Again, a large number of women high on masculinity and low on femininity were feminists: however, women high on both masculinity and femininity were underrepresented in NOW. Different results in the two studies are discussed in terms of the different ways that feminism was measured.
两项研究探讨了女权主义与性别角色之间的关系。在女大学生中,性别角色类型通过鲍科姆(1976年)的男性特质与女性特质量表(MSC和FMN)以及贝姆性别角色量表(贝姆,1974年)来衡量。女权主义通过对女性态度量表(AWS,简表)(斯彭斯和赫尔姆赖希,1972年)和妇女解放量表(WLS)(戈德堡,1976年)来衡量。预计有两组女性比其他女性更支持女权主义。(a)在男性特质和女性特质上得分都高的人,以及(b)在男性特质上得分高而在女性特质上得分低的人。研究结果使用AWS支持了这两个假设,但使用WLS则不然。在第二项研究中,MSC和FMN作为形成性别角色类型的基础,女权主义通过参与全国妇女组织(NOW)来衡量。同样,大量男性特质高而女性特质低的女性是女权主义者:然而,在全国妇女组织中,男性特质和女性特质都高的女性代表不足。两项研究结果的差异根据衡量女权主义的不同方式进行了讨论。