Small A C, Erdwins C, Gross R B
Dept. of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1979 Aug;43(4):393-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4304_10.
This study compares two instruments which have recently been devised to measure sex-role identification, Heilbrun's Masculinity and Femininity Scales and the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Correlations between the masculine and feminine scales of these instruments were significant for male but not female subjects; intrascale comparisons found no relationship between the Bem scales but moderate correlations between the Heilbrun scales for male subjects. There was agreement between the two measures in classifying approximately 47% of the subjects into one of the four sex-role categories. Misclassification occurred primarily on categories which have been found to show considerable overlap in personality characteristics.
本研究比较了最近设计的两种用于测量性别角色认同的工具,即海尔布伦的男性气质和女性气质量表以及贝姆性别角色量表。这些工具的男性量表和女性量表之间的相关性在男性受试者中显著,但在女性受试者中不显著;量表内比较发现,贝姆量表之间没有关系,但男性受试者的海尔布伦量表之间存在适度的相关性。两种测量方法在将约47%的受试者分类到四个性别角色类别之一方面达成了一致。错误分类主要发生在那些在人格特征上有相当重叠的类别上。