Bell B E, Loftus E F
University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1985 Dec;49(6):659-64. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4906_16.
When witnesses at a trial offer testimony that is vivid, it may be more persuasive than the same testimony offered in a pallid manner. In this paper we elucidate three categories of variables (inferential, attentional/memorial, and affective) that are likely to mediate the effects of the vividness of testimony on jury judgments. These variables are then used to explain discrepant findings among mock juror experiments investigating vividness effects. Finally, we discuss the implications of vividness effects for the legal system.
