• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自陈式人格障碍量表中的性别与性取向偏差:米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI-II)、明尼苏达多项人格测验(MMPI)及人格障碍问卷修订版(PDQ-R)的项目分析

Sex and gender bias in self-report personality disorder inventories: item analysis of the MCMI-II, MMPI, and PDQ-R.

作者信息

Lindsay K A, Widiger T A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506-0044, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1995 Aug;65(1):1-20. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6501_1.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6501_1
PMID:16367643
Abstract

There has been considerable controversy and research regarding sex bias in the diagnosis of personality disorders, but little has involved self-report inventories. Thus this study investigated items from the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II (Millon, 1987), the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (Morey, Waugh, & Blashfield, 1985), and the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised (Hyler & Rieder, 1987). Subjects (N = 189) completed the Histrionic, Dependent, Antisocial, and Narcissistic scales from these inventories, along with the Bem Sex Role Inventory (Bem, 1974) and the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (Derogatis, 1977). Items were considered to evidence sex or gender bias if they (a) failed to correlate with dysfunction and (b) exhibited sex or gender role differences. At least 13 items evidenced sex bias (76 items using a more liberal threshold). The majority were from Narcissistic scales; few Histrionic items evidenced sex or gender bias. Implications with respect to sex-bias assessment and item construction are discussed.

摘要

关于人格障碍诊断中的性别偏见,已经存在相当多的争议和研究,但涉及自我报告量表的研究却很少。因此,本研究调查了米隆临床多轴量表第二版(米隆,1987年)、明尼苏达多相人格量表(莫雷、沃和布拉什菲尔德,1985年)以及修订版人格诊断问卷(海勒和里德,1987年)中的项目。研究对象(N = 189)完成了这些量表中的表演型、依赖型、反社会型和自恋型量表,以及贝姆性别角色量表(贝姆,1974年)和症状自评量表90修订版(德罗加蒂斯,1977年)。如果项目(a)与功能障碍不相关且(b)表现出性别或性别角色差异,则认为这些项目存在性别偏见。至少有13个项目存在性别偏见(使用更宽松的阈值时有76个项目)。大多数项目来自自恋型量表;很少有表演型项目存在性别偏见。本文讨论了性别偏见评估和项目构建方面的影响。

相似文献

1
Sex and gender bias in self-report personality disorder inventories: item analysis of the MCMI-II, MMPI, and PDQ-R.自陈式人格障碍量表中的性别与性取向偏差:米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI-II)、明尼苏达多项人格测验(MMPI)及人格障碍问卷修订版(PDQ-R)的项目分析
J Pers Assess. 1995 Aug;65(1):1-20. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6501_1.
2
Disorder concept scales and personality dimensions in a young adult sample.年轻成人样本中的疾病概念量表与人格维度
Psychol Rep. 1999 Dec;85(3 Pt 2):1135-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1999.85.3f.1135.
3
Estimation of MCMI DSM-III axis II constructs from MMPI scales and subscales.从明尼苏达多项人格调查表(MMPI)量表及分量表估计米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)DSM-III轴II结构。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Fall;55(1-2):195-201. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674058.
4
Contributions of discriminant analysis to differential diagnosis by self-report.判别分析对自我报告鉴别诊断的贡献。
J Pers Assess. 1994 Apr;62(2):320-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6202_12.
5
The diagnosis and assessment of depression, mania, and psychosis by self-report.通过自我报告对抑郁症、躁狂症和精神病进行诊断与评估。
J Pers Assess. 1993 Feb;60(1):1-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6001_1.
6
An examination of three sets of MMPI-2 personality disorder scales.对三套明尼苏达多项人格调查表第二版(MMPI-2)人格障碍量表的检验。
J Pers Disord. 2005 Aug;19(4):370-85. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.4.370.
7
Gender bias in self-report personality disorder inventories.
J Pers Disord. 2000 Fall;14(3):218-32. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.3.218.
8
The psychological assessment of depression: unipolars versus bipolars.
J Pers Assess. 1995 Dec;65(3):557-66. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_14.
9
Personality characteristics of ADHD adults assessed with the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II: evidence of four distinct subtypes.使用米隆临床多轴问卷第二版评估多动症成年人的人格特征:四种不同亚型的证据。
J Pers Assess. 2000 Oct;75(2):237-48. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_5.
10
Psychometric properties of a cognitive measure of personality disorders.
J Pers Assess. 1993 Dec;61(3):536-46. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6103_10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationships between Personality Disorders and Early Maladaptive Schemas and the Moderating Role of Gender.人格障碍与早期适应不良图式之间的关系以及性别的调节作用。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 19;22(1):12-18. doi: 10.5455/apd.114935. eCollection 2021 Jan.
2
Confidence in Dementia Management and Its Associated Factors among Primary Care Doctors in Malaysia.马来西亚初级保健医生对痴呆症管理的信心及其相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 13;19(16):9995. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169995.
3
Cognitive and Physiological Measures in Well-Being Science: Limitations and Lessons.
幸福科学中的认知与生理测量:局限与启示
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 12;10:1630. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01630. eCollection 2019.
4
Interpersonal dysfunction in personality disorders: A meta-analytic review.人格障碍中的人际功能障碍:一项元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Jul;143(7):677-734. doi: 10.1037/bul0000101. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
ASD in females: are we overstating the gender difference in diagnosis?女性中的孤独症谱系障碍:我们是否夸大了诊断中的性别差异?
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2014 Mar;17(1):67-84. doi: 10.1007/s10567-013-0148-9.
6
The impact of NEO PI-R gender norms on the assessment of personality disorder profiles.NEO PI-R 性别规范对人格障碍特征评估的影响。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Sep;22(3):539-45. doi: 10.1037/a0019580.
7
Gender bias in diagnostic criteria for personality disorders: an item response theory analysis.人格障碍诊断标准中的性别偏见:一项项目反应理论分析。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Feb;116(1):166-75. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.166.