Viglione D J
California School of Professional Psychology, San Diego, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1996 Dec;67(3):579-87. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_12.
Archer and Krishnamurthy (1993a, 1993b) systematically reviewed the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-Rorschach research and found that there is minimal if any association between the two tests. In response to this review, data are reported demonstrating a positive association between various Rorschach variables and objective criteria. Data gleaned from published and yet unpublished sources suggest that the Rorschach is related to various self-report, other-report, and behavioral criteria, with children and adults, for psychosis and other constructs. Data are also presented suggesting that part of the disagreement between the two tests may be due to different types of response bias and positive self-presentations on the two tests. Research findings pertinent to differential validity as a function of the number of Rorschach responses protocol are also explored. I conclude with research recommendations regarding test-specific understandings of response bias and Rorschach protocol complexity as a moderator variable.
阿彻和克里希纳穆尔蒂(1993年a版、1993年b版)系统回顾了明尼苏达多相人格问卷(MMPI)与罗夏墨迹测验的相关研究,发现这两项测验之间即便存在关联,也是微乎其微的。针对这一综述,有报告称数据表明罗夏墨迹测验的各种变量与客观标准之间存在正相关。从已发表和未发表的资料中收集到的数据表明,罗夏墨迹测验与各种自我报告、他人报告以及行为标准相关,涉及儿童和成人,以及精神病和其他构念。还呈现了数据表明两项测验之间的部分分歧可能是由于两种测验存在不同类型的反应偏差和积极的自我呈现。还探讨了与罗夏墨迹测验反应记录数量相关的差异效度的研究发现。我最后提出了关于将对反应偏差和罗夏墨迹测验记录复杂性的特定测验理解作为调节变量的研究建议。