克兰斯冒名顶替现象量表的验证
Validation of the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale.
作者信息
Chrisman S M, Pieper W A, Clance P R, Holland C L, Glickauf-Hughes C
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta 30303-3083, USA.
出版信息
J Pers Assess. 1995 Dec;65(3):456-67. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_6.
The Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS; Clance, 1985) was compared to the newly developed Perceived Fraudulence Scale (Kolligian & Sternberg, 1991). The two scales were found to have high internal consistency and to correlate in a similar manner with other measures. Further, discriminant validity evidence for the Impostor Phenomenon (IP) was provided by comparing the CIPS to measures of depression, self-esteem, social anxiety, and self-monitoring. The IP was related to, but substantially discriminable from, these constructs. Finally, construct validity evidence for the CIPS was provided through principal components analysis that yielded three stable factors: Fake, Discount, and Luck.
将克兰斯冒名顶替现象量表（CIPS；克兰斯，1985年）与新开发的感知欺诈量表（科利吉安和斯滕伯格，1991年）进行了比较。发现这两个量表具有较高的内部一致性，并且与其他测量方法的相关性方式相似。此外，通过将CIPS与抑郁、自尊、社交焦虑和自我监控的测量方法进行比较，提供了冒名顶替现象（IP）的判别效度证据。IP与这些构念相关，但又有显著区别。最后，通过主成分分析为CIPS提供了结构效度证据，该分析产生了三个稳定因素：虚假、折扣和运气。
Zotero 插件