Poolton J M, Maxwell J P, Masters R S W, Raab M
Institute of Human Performance, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
J Sports Sci. 2006 Jan;24(1):89-99. doi: 10.1080/02640410500130854.
We conducted two experiments to assess the effect attentional focus has on learning a complex motor skill and subsequent performance under secondary task loading. Participants in Experiment 1 learnt a golf putting task (300 practice trials) with a single instruction to either focus on their hands (internal focus) or the movement of the putter (external focus). No group differences were evident during learning or retention. Differences between the groups were only apparent under secondary task load; the external group's performance remained robust, while the internal group suffered a drop in performance. Verbal protocols demonstrated that the internal group accumulated significantly more internal knowledge and more task-relevant knowledge in general than the external group. Experiment 2 was designed to establish whether greater internal focus knowledge or greater explicit rule build up in general was responsible for performance breakdown. Two groups were presented with a set of six internal or external rules. Again, no performance differences were found during learning or retention. During the secondary task, both groups experienced performance deterioration. It was concluded that accumulation of explicit rules to guide performance was responsible for the internal group's breakdown in performance under secondary task loading and may be responsible for some of the performance differences reported previously.
我们进行了两项实验,以评估注意力焦点对学习复杂运动技能以及在次要任务负荷下后续表现的影响。实验1的参与者学习一项高尔夫推杆任务(300次练习试验),他们只收到一条指令,即要么专注于自己的手部(内部焦点),要么专注于推杆的动作(外部焦点)。在学习或保持阶段,两组之间没有明显差异。两组之间的差异仅在次要任务负荷下才明显;外部焦点组的表现保持强劲,而内部焦点组的表现则有所下降。口头报告表明,总体而言,内部焦点组比外部焦点组积累了更多的内部知识和更多与任务相关的知识。实验2旨在确定是更多的内部焦点知识还是总体上更多的明确规则积累导致了表现下降。给两组呈现了一组六条内部或外部规则。同样,在学习或保持阶段未发现表现差异。在次要任务期间,两组的表现都出现了恶化。得出的结论是,用于指导表现的明确规则的积累是内部焦点组在次要任务负荷下表现下降的原因,并且可能是先前报道的一些表现差异的原因。