UCL Interaction Centre, University College London, MPEB 8th floor, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Oct;113(2):662-70. doi: 10.2466/05.23.25.PMS.113.5.662-670.
The effect of different sources of external attentional focus on learning a motor skill was assessed in the present study. 30 students (12 men, 18 women) participated voluntarily and were divided, according to type of external focus, into target, club swing, and target-club swing groups. The task was a golf putting skill. The target focus group attended to the target (hole), the club swing focus group attended to the execution of the club's swing, and the target-club swing focus group attended to both. All participants performed 50 trials of the putting skill in the acquisition phase and 10 trials in the 24-hr. delayed retention phase. The dependent variable was the error in the putting skill measured as the distance from the hole to the ball after each strike. Results showed the target-club swing focus group had better scores in the acquisition and retention phases than the other groups. It was concluded that external focus instruction helped the learners to integrate target cue with action cue and is more effective in skill learning than other external-focus instructions. These results support the claims of ecological psychology theorists concerning the effects of external focus of attention.
本研究评估了不同外部注意焦点源对学习运动技能的影响。30 名学生(12 名男性,18 名女性)自愿参加,并根据外部焦点的类型分为目标、球杆挥杆和目标-球杆挥杆组。任务是高尔夫推杆技能。目标焦点组关注目标(球洞),球杆挥杆焦点组关注球杆的挥杆动作,目标-球杆挥杆焦点组同时关注两者。所有参与者在获得阶段进行 50 次推杆练习,在 24 小时延迟保留阶段进行 10 次练习。因变量是推杆技能的错误,测量方法是每次击球后球离球洞的距离。结果表明,目标-球杆挥杆焦点组在获得和保留阶段的得分优于其他组。研究结论是外部焦点指导有助于学习者将目标线索与动作线索结合起来,比其他外部焦点指导更有效地促进技能学习。这些结果支持生态心理学理论家关于外部注意焦点的影响的观点。