Johansson Torsten, Bachrach-Lindström Margareta, Aspenberg Per, Jonsson Dick, Wahlström Ola
Department of Neuroscience and Locomotion, Division of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Int Orthop. 2006 Feb;30(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-005-0037-z. Epub 2005 Dec 23.
We randomised 143 patients--age 75 years or older--with displaced femoral neck fracture to either internal fixation or total hip replacement (THR) and compared the socio-economic consequences. In the internal fixation group, 34 of 78 hips underwent secondary surgery. In the THR group, 12 of 68 hips dislocated, the majority in mentally impaired patients. We calculated the total hospital costs for two years after operation. When secondary surgery was included, there was no difference in costs between the internal fixation and THR groups, or between the mentally impaired and lucid subgroups. The costs to the community were calculated comparing the baseline cost before surgery with the average cost per month during the first postoperative year. No difference was found between the treatment groups. The Harris hip scores were higher in the THR group, and pain was more common in the internal fixation group. In lucid patients, THR gives a better clinical result at the same cost.
我们将143例75岁及以上的股骨颈移位骨折患者随机分为内固定组或全髋关节置换(THR)组,并比较了其社会经济后果。在内固定组中,78髋中有34髋接受了二次手术。在THR组中,68髋中有12髋发生脱位,大多数发生在精神障碍患者中。我们计算了术后两年的总住院费用。当纳入二次手术后,内固定组和THR组之间、精神障碍亚组和清醒亚组之间的费用没有差异。通过比较手术前的基线成本与术后第一年每月的平均成本来计算社区成本。治疗组之间未发现差异。THR组的Harris髋关节评分更高,内固定组疼痛更常见。在清醒患者中,THR在相同成本下能取得更好的临床效果。