McNabb Alan, Adie Kathy, Rodrigues Mabel, Black William A, Isaac-Renton Judith
Laboratory Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Canada.
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Jan;44(1):60-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.1.60-66.2006.
We investigated extending the use of direct partial hsp65 gene sequencing for the identification of mycobacteria to isolates in primary liquid detection media as an economical, feasible, and more rapid means of identification. During the course of the study, the hsp65 sequence-based identifications for isolates from 670 primary liquid detection media determined to be positive for acid-fast bacilli were compared to the identifications derived from Accuprobes, biochemical test panels, or 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Preliminary analysis indicated a 97.6% concordance, with a final agreement of 99.1% between the identification algorithms. hsp65 sequencing costs (32.84 US dollars) were greater than the cost of identification with Accuprobe (9 US dollars) but less than the cost of the biochemical test panel identification (average cost, 98.90 US dollars) and equivalent to the cost of 16S rRNA sequencing, although there was a referral cost (59.85 US dollars) for the shipping of isolates to another reference laboratory. Analysis indicated that our laboratory would have recognized a cost savings of approximately 12,000 US dollars by using hsp65 sequencing to identify isolates from specimens with a negative fluorescent- smear status and would have achieved further savings by using it as an alternative to biochemical panel testing for fluorescent-smear-positive specimens. The time to identification by hsp65 gene sequencing was slightly longer than that required by the Accuprobe assay (1 versus 2 days), shorter than that required by the biochemical test panels (2 days versus 26 days on average), and more rapid than referral for 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
我们研究了将直接部分hsp65基因测序用于分枝杆菌鉴定的方法扩展至原代液体检测培养基中的分离株,作为一种经济、可行且更快速的鉴定手段。在研究过程中,将基于hsp65序列对670份经确定抗酸杆菌呈阳性的原代液体检测培养基中的分离株进行的鉴定,与源自Accuprobes、生化检测板或16S rRNA基因测序的鉴定结果进行了比较。初步分析显示一致性为97.6%,鉴定算法之间的最终一致性为99.1%。hsp65测序成本(32.84美元)高于Accuprobe鉴定成本(9美元),但低于生化检测板鉴定成本(平均成本98.90美元),且与16S rRNA测序成本相当,不过将分离株运送至另一家参考实验室存在送检成本(59.85美元)。分析表明,我们实验室若使用hsp65测序来鉴定荧光涂片结果为阴性的标本中的分离株,将节省约12,000美元的成本,若将其用作荧光涂片阳性标本生化检测板检测的替代方法,还可进一步节省成本。通过hsp65基因测序进行鉴定所需的时间略长于Accuprobe检测所需时间(分别为1天和2天),短于生化检测板所需时间(平均分别为2天和26天),且比送检进行16S rRNA基因测序更快。