Carp Howard J A, Sapir Tal, Shoenfeld Yehuda
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2005 Dec;29(3):327-32. doi: 10.1385/CRIAI:29:3:327.
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been used to prevent pregnancy loss, in unexplained recurrent miscarriage, and in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). When used on an unselected population with recurrent miscarriage, IVIg has not been shown to improve the live birth rate. However, when patients are selected for poor prognosis or autoimmune phenomena, IVIg has been shown to be effective. This article discusses the possible immune mechanisms by which IVIg may act and the effect of confounding factors such as embryonic chromosomal aberrations or anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies in APS. Hence, there may be an impression of futility, when IVIg may be highly effective in saving those pregnancies that can be saved. Additionally, in an unselected population with recurrent miscarriage, there is a relatively good prognosis for a subsequent live birth (60%). Therefore, the spontaneous prognosis must be taken into account, which has not been the case in previous trials.
静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)已被用于预防原因不明的复发性流产以及抗磷脂综合征(APS)中的妊娠丢失。在未经过挑选的复发性流产人群中使用IVIg时,尚未显示其能提高活产率。然而,当选择预后不良或有自身免疫现象的患者时,IVIg已被证明是有效的。本文讨论了IVIg可能起作用的免疫机制以及诸如胚胎染色体畸变或APS中抗β2糖蛋白I抗体等混杂因素的影响。因此,当IVIg可能对挽救那些可以挽救的妊娠非常有效时,可能会给人一种徒劳无功的印象。此外,在未经过挑选的复发性流产人群中,后续活产的预后相对较好(60%)。因此,必须考虑自然预后情况,而以往的试验中并未如此。