Suppr超能文献

在对涉嫌性虐待受害者进行访谈时,解剖玩偶在功能和使用上的发育差异。

Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.

作者信息

Thierry Karen L, Lamb Michael E, Orbach Yael, Pipe Margaret-Ellen

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Dec;73(6):1125-34. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1125.

Abstract

The impact of anatomical dolls on reports provided by 3- to 12-year-old alleged sexual abuse victims (N = 178) was examined. Children produced as many details in response to open-ended invitations with and without the dolls. In response to directive questions, the 3- to 6-year-olds were more likely to re-enact behaviorally than to report verbally, whereas the 7- to 12-year-olds produced more verbal details than enactments when using the dolls. With the dolls, the younger children were more likely than the older children to play suggestively and to contradict details provided without the dolls, whereas the older children were more likely to provide details that were consistent. Children in both age groups produced proportionally more fantastic details with the dolls than without the dolls.

摘要

研究了解剖玩偶对178名3至12岁性虐待指控受害者所提供报告的影响。无论有无玩偶,儿童在回应开放式询问时给出的细节数量相同。在回答指示性问题时,3至6岁的儿童更倾向于通过行为重演而非口头报告,而7至12岁的儿童在使用玩偶时给出的口头细节比行为重演更多。使用玩偶时,年幼儿童比年长儿童更有可能进行暗示性玩耍,并与不使用玩偶时提供的细节相矛盾,而年长儿童则更有可能提供一致的细节。两个年龄组的儿童在使用玩偶时比不使用玩偶时给出的荒诞细节比例更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验