• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[大麦网斑病病原菌——大麦网斑病菌致病力的遗传控制]

[Genetic control of virulence of Pyrenophora teres drechs, the causative agent of net blotch in barley].

作者信息

Mironenko N V, Afanasenko O S, Filatova O A, Kopahnke D

出版信息

Genetika. 2005 Dec;41(12):1674-80.

PMID:16396454
Abstract

The genetic control of virulence was studied in four isolates of the fungus Pyrenophora teres f. teres, originating from various geographic regions in experiments with nine barley accessions, possessing known resistance genes. Experiments were performed with the ascospore progeny of two crosses. The results of segregation for virulence in the progeny of direct crosses were confirmed by analysis of backcrosses and sib crosses. One to four genes for avirulence toward various barley genotypes were found in the isolates under study. It is suggested that dominant suppressor genes are involved in the genetic control of avirulence toward four barley genotypes.

摘要

对来自不同地理区域的四种真菌网斑病菌圆斑专化型分离株的毒力遗传控制进行了研究,实验中使用了九个具有已知抗性基因的大麦种质。对两个杂交组合的子囊孢子后代进行了实验。通过回交和姊妹交分析证实了直接杂交后代中毒力分离的结果。在所研究的分离株中发现了一至四个针对不同大麦基因型的无毒力基因。研究表明,显性抑制基因参与了对四种大麦基因型无毒力的遗传控制。

相似文献

1
[Genetic control of virulence of Pyrenophora teres drechs, the causative agent of net blotch in barley].[大麦网斑病病原菌——大麦网斑病菌致病力的遗传控制]
Genetika. 2005 Dec;41(12):1674-80.
2
Pyrenophora teres: profile of an increasingly damaging barley pathogen.禾谷丝核菌:一种危害性日益增加的大麦病原菌。
Mol Plant Pathol. 2011 Jan;12(1):1-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00649.x.
3
Genetic mapping of Pyrenophora teres f. teres genes conferring avirulence on barley.赋予大麦无毒性的圆核腔菌圆核腔菌变种基因的遗传图谱绘制。
Fungal Genet Biol. 2007 May;44(5):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.11.009. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
4
Genetic analysis of virulence in the Pyrenophora teres f. teres population BB25×FGOH04Ptt-21.在 Pyrenophora teres f. teres 群体 BB25×FGOH04Ptt-21 中进行毒力的遗传分析。
Fungal Genet Biol. 2017 Oct;107:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
5
Virulence profile and genetic structure of a North Dakota population of Pyrenophora teres f. teres, the causal agent of net form net blotch of barley.北达科他州层出柄锈菌群体的毒性特征和遗传结构,该菌是大麦网斑病的致病菌。
Phytopathology. 2012 May;102(5):539-46. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-09-11-0243.
6
Mating type locus-specific polymerase chain reaction markers for differentiation of Pyrenophora teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata, the causal agents of barley net blotch.区分禾谷丝核菌禾谷变种和禾谷丝核菌叶斑变种,即大麦网斑病病原菌的交配型座特异性聚合酶链反应标记。
Phytopathology. 2010 Dec;100(12):1298-306. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-05-10-0135.
7
Genetic differentiation in Pyrenophora teres populations measured with AFLP markers.利用AFLP标记测定的网斑病菌群体的遗传分化。
Mycol Res. 2007 Feb;111(Pt 2):213-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.11.009.
8
Evaluation of a Pyrenophora teres f. teres mapping population reveals multiple independent interactions with a region of barley chromosome 6H.对网斑病菌条形柄锈菌变种的一个作图群体的评估揭示了与大麦6H染色体区域的多个独立互作。
Fungal Genet Biol. 2014 Sep;70:104-12. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.07.012. Epub 2014 Aug 2.
9
Mapping net form net blotch and septoria speckled leaf blotch resistance Loci in barley.定位大麦中抗网斑病和条斑叶枯病的基因位点。
Phytopathology. 2010 Jan;100(1):80-4. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-100-1-0080.
10
Fine Mapping of the Barley Chromosome 6H Net Form Net Blotch Susceptibility Locus.大麦6H染色体网形网斑病感病基因座的精细定位
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Jul 7;6(7):1809-18. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.028902.

引用本文的文献

1
: Taxonomy, Morphology, Interaction With Barley, and Mode of Control.分类学、形态学、与大麦的相互作用及防治方式
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Apr 6;12:614951. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.614951. eCollection 2021.
2
Expression Analysis of Cell Wall-Related Genes in the Plant Pathogenic Fungus .细胞壁相关基因在植物病原真菌中的表达分析
Genes (Basel). 2020 Mar 12;11(3):300. doi: 10.3390/genes11030300.