Rossini David, Magri Lorenzo, Lucca Adelio, Giordani Silvia, Smeraldi Enrico, Zanardi Raffaella
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Via Stamina d'Ancona 20, 20127 Milan, Italy.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;66(12):1569-75. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n1212.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been mainly studied as adjunctive treatment for drug-resistant patients. We assessed the effectiveness of rTMS started concomitantly with antidepressant medications in non-drug-resistant major depressive disorder patients. We also evaluated if, among the 3 antidepressants administered, one had a better synergy with rTMS.
In this 5-week, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study, we recruited 99 inpatients suffering from a major depressive episode (DSM-IV criteria). They were randomly assigned to receive venlafaxine, sertraline, or escitalopram in combination with a 2-week period of sham or active 15-Hz rTMS on the left dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex. Data were gathered from February 2004 to June 2005.
The active rTMS group showed a significantly faster reduction in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores compared with the sham group (p = .0029). The response and remission rates were significantly greater in the active rTMS group after the stimulation period (p = .002 and p = .003, respectively), but not at the endpoint. We found no significant difference in HAM-D score reduction among the 3 drugs administered, either in the active or in the sham group.
These findings support the efficacy of rTMS in hastening the response to antidepressant drugs in patients with major depressive disorder. The effect of rTMS seems to be unaffected by the specific concomitantly administered drug.
背景/目的:重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)主要作为耐药患者的辅助治疗方法进行研究。我们评估了在非耐药性重度抑郁症患者中,与抗抑郁药物同时开始使用rTMS的有效性。我们还评估了在使用的3种抗抑郁药物中,是否有一种与rTMS具有更好的协同作用。
在这项为期5周的双盲、随机、假刺激对照研究中,我们招募了99名患有重度抑郁发作(符合DSM-IV标准)的住院患者。他们被随机分配接受文拉法辛、舍曲林或艾司西酞普兰,并在左侧背外侧前额叶皮层接受为期2周的假刺激或15赫兹的主动rTMS。数据收集时间为2004年2月至2005年6月。
与假刺激组相比,主动rTMS组的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)评分下降明显更快(p = 0.0029)。刺激期后,主动rTMS组的有效率和缓解率显著更高(分别为p = 0.002和p = 0.003),但在研究终点时并非如此。我们发现,无论是主动组还是假刺激组,在使用的3种药物之间,HAM-D评分降低均无显著差异。
这些发现支持rTMS在加速重度抑郁症患者对抗抑郁药物反应方面的疗效。rTMS的效果似乎不受同时使用的特定药物的影响。