School of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 73000, PR China.
Second Provincial Peoples Hospital of Gansu, Lanzhou, 73000, PR China.
Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 20;13(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02480-w.
BACKGROUND: Antidepressants, noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), and their combination are commonly used in routine clinical practice. Nevertheless, there is a continuous dispute regarding whether the effectiveness of NIBS in combination with antidepressants exceeds that of antidepressants alone. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the existing evidence and draw a definitive conclusion on this issue. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of five databases: Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, SinoMed, and the Cochrane Database of Randomized Controlled Trials. The search was conducted until October 6, 2023. The primary outcomes were the pre- and post-intervention depression and anxiety scores. Secondary outcomes included dropout rates, response rates, and certain levels of neurotransmitters [ 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), dopamine (DA), and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)] at the end of the intervention. Subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. The data were analysed using R 4.2.2. RESULTS: We included 18 RCTs [1357 participants; 11 studies used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and 7 studies used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)]. The follow-up duration varied from two weeks to three months. Overall, whether in combination with rTMS or tDCS, antidepressants proved more effective in alleviating depressive symptoms compared to when used as monotherapy. However, this advantage was not evident during the follow-up period. (p > 0.05). And the combination's efficacy in improving anxiety was found to be lacking. Post-treatment serum levels of 5-HT, DA, and GABA were higher in the rTMS group were higher than antidepressant medication group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, subgroup analysis results indicated that only the rTMS + antidepressant medication treatment significantly improved remission and remission rates. The meta-regression results showed that the type of antidepressant and the sex of the participants had a significant association with the depression score. CONCLUSION: Combination treatment with NIBS was significantly more effective in improving depression symptoms than medication alone. rTMS combined with antidepressants appears to be more effective in improving response and remission rates. However, efficacy may be influenced by the type of medicine used in combination, and long-term efficacy data is lacking. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023388259.
背景:抗抑郁药、非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)及其联合应用在常规临床实践中较为常见。然而,关于 NIBS 联合抗抑郁药是否比单独使用抗抑郁药更有效,一直存在争议。本研究旨在评估现有证据并对此问题得出明确结论。
方法:我们全面检索了 Embase、PubMed、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库(SinoMed)和 Cochrane 随机对照试验数据库,检索时间截至 2023 年 10 月 6 日。主要结局指标为干预前后的抑郁和焦虑评分。次要结局指标包括脱落率、应答率和干预结束时某些神经递质[5-羟色胺(5-HT)、多巴胺(DA)和γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)]的水平。采用 R 4.2.2 进行亚组、Meta 回归和敏感性分析,以探讨异质性的来源。
结果:共纳入 18 项 RCT 研究[1357 名参与者;11 项研究使用重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),7 项研究使用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)]。随访时间从 2 周到 3 个月不等。总体而言,无论与 rTMS 还是 tDCS 联合应用,抗抑郁药在缓解抑郁症状方面均优于单独使用。然而,在随访期间,这种优势并不明显(p>0.05)。并且联合治疗在改善焦虑方面的疗效并不显著。rTMS 组治疗后血清 5-HT、DA 和 GABA 水平高于抗抑郁药物组(p<0.05)。此外,亚组分析结果表明,只有 rTMS+抗抑郁药治疗显著提高了缓解率和缓解率。Meta 回归结果表明,抗抑郁药的类型和参与者的性别与抑郁评分显著相关。
结论:与单独使用药物相比,NIBS 联合治疗在改善抑郁症状方面更为有效。rTMS 联合抗抑郁药似乎更能提高应答率和缓解率。然而,疗效可能受到联合用药类型的影响,且缺乏长期疗效数据。
系统综述注册:PROSPERO CRD42023388259。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-5-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-3-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-8-2
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-5-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-11-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-7-5
Health Technol Assess. 2024-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-13
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024-7-8
Neural Regen Res. 2026-3-1
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2025-3-14
Front Pharmacol. 2024-7-25
Turk J Med Sci. 2022-8