Griffiths Kathleen M, Christensen Helen
Depression & Anxiety Consumer Research Unit, Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Nov 15;7(5):e55. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.5.e55.
The rating tool DISCERN was designed for use by consumers without content expertise to evaluate the quality of health information. There is some evidence that DISCERN may be a valid indicator of evidence-based website quality when applied by health professionals. However, it is not known if the tool is a valid measure of evidence-based quality when used by consumers. Since it is a lengthy instrument requiring training in its use, DISCERN may prove impractical for use by the typical consumer. It is therefore important to explore the validity of other simpler potential indicators of site quality such as Google PageRank.
This study aimed to determine (1) whether the instrument DISCERN is a valid indicator of evidence-based Web content quality for consumers without specific mental health training, and (2) whether Google PageRank is an indicator of website content quality as measured by an evidence-based gold standard.
This was a cross-sectional survey of depression websites using consumer and health professional raters. The main outcome measures were (1) site characteristics, (2) evidence-based quality of content as measured by evidence-based depression guidelines, (3) DISCERN scores, (4) Google PageRank, and (5) user satisfaction.
There was a significant association between evidence-based quality ratings and average DISCERN ratings both for consumers (r = 0.62, P = .001) and health professionals (r = 0.80, P < .001). Consumer and health professional DISCERN ratings were significantly correlated (r = 0.77, P < .001). The evidence-based quality score correlated with Google PageRank (r = 0.59, P = .002). However, the correlation between DISCERN scores and user satisfaction was higher than the correlation between Google PageRank and user satisfaction.
DISCERN has potential as an indicator of content quality when used either by experts or by consumers. Google PageRank shows some promise as an automatic indicator of quality.
评估工具DISCERN旨在供没有内容专业知识的消费者使用,以评估健康信息的质量。有证据表明,当由健康专业人员应用时,DISCERN可能是基于证据的网站质量的有效指标。然而,尚不清楚该工具在由消费者使用时是否是基于证据的质量的有效衡量标准。由于它是一个冗长的工具,使用时需要培训,DISCERN对于普通消费者来说可能不实用。因此,探索其他更简单的潜在网站质量指标(如谷歌页面排名)的有效性很重要。
本研究旨在确定:(1)DISCERN工具对于没有特定心理健康培训的消费者来说是否是基于证据的网络内容质量的有效指标;(2)谷歌页面排名是否是以基于证据的黄金标准衡量的网站内容质量的指标。
这是一项对抑郁症网站的横断面调查,使用了消费者和健康专业人员评分者。主要结局指标为:(1)网站特征;(2)根据基于证据的抑郁症指南衡量的基于证据的内容质量;(3)DISCERN评分;(4)谷歌页面排名;(5)用户满意度。
基于证据的质量评分与消费者(r = 0.62,P = 0.001)和健康专业人员(r = 0.80,P < 0.001)的平均DISCERN评分之间均存在显著关联。消费者和健康专业人员的DISCERN评分显著相关(r = 0.77,P < 0.001)。基于证据的质量得分与谷歌页面排名相关(r = 0.59,P = 0.002)。然而,DISCERN评分与用户满意度之间的相关性高于谷歌页面排名与用户满意度之间的相关性。
DISCERN无论是由专家还是消费者使用,都有潜力作为内容质量的指标。谷歌页面排名作为质量的自动指标显示出一些前景。