Suppr超能文献

面向消费者的网站质量指标。

Website quality indicators for consumers.

作者信息

Griffiths Kathleen M, Christensen Helen

机构信息

Depression & Anxiety Consumer Research Unit, Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2005 Nov 15;7(5):e55. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.5.e55.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rating tool DISCERN was designed for use by consumers without content expertise to evaluate the quality of health information. There is some evidence that DISCERN may be a valid indicator of evidence-based website quality when applied by health professionals. However, it is not known if the tool is a valid measure of evidence-based quality when used by consumers. Since it is a lengthy instrument requiring training in its use, DISCERN may prove impractical for use by the typical consumer. It is therefore important to explore the validity of other simpler potential indicators of site quality such as Google PageRank.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine (1) whether the instrument DISCERN is a valid indicator of evidence-based Web content quality for consumers without specific mental health training, and (2) whether Google PageRank is an indicator of website content quality as measured by an evidence-based gold standard.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional survey of depression websites using consumer and health professional raters. The main outcome measures were (1) site characteristics, (2) evidence-based quality of content as measured by evidence-based depression guidelines, (3) DISCERN scores, (4) Google PageRank, and (5) user satisfaction.

RESULTS

There was a significant association between evidence-based quality ratings and average DISCERN ratings both for consumers (r = 0.62, P = .001) and health professionals (r = 0.80, P < .001). Consumer and health professional DISCERN ratings were significantly correlated (r = 0.77, P < .001). The evidence-based quality score correlated with Google PageRank (r = 0.59, P = .002). However, the correlation between DISCERN scores and user satisfaction was higher than the correlation between Google PageRank and user satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

DISCERN has potential as an indicator of content quality when used either by experts or by consumers. Google PageRank shows some promise as an automatic indicator of quality.

摘要

背景

评估工具DISCERN旨在供没有内容专业知识的消费者使用,以评估健康信息的质量。有证据表明,当由健康专业人员应用时,DISCERN可能是基于证据的网站质量的有效指标。然而,尚不清楚该工具在由消费者使用时是否是基于证据的质量的有效衡量标准。由于它是一个冗长的工具,使用时需要培训,DISCERN对于普通消费者来说可能不实用。因此,探索其他更简单的潜在网站质量指标(如谷歌页面排名)的有效性很重要。

目的

本研究旨在确定:(1)DISCERN工具对于没有特定心理健康培训的消费者来说是否是基于证据的网络内容质量的有效指标;(2)谷歌页面排名是否是以基于证据的黄金标准衡量的网站内容质量的指标。

方法

这是一项对抑郁症网站的横断面调查,使用了消费者和健康专业人员评分者。主要结局指标为:(1)网站特征;(2)根据基于证据的抑郁症指南衡量的基于证据的内容质量;(3)DISCERN评分;(4)谷歌页面排名;(5)用户满意度。

结果

基于证据的质量评分与消费者(r = 0.62,P = 0.001)和健康专业人员(r = 0.80,P < 0.001)的平均DISCERN评分之间均存在显著关联。消费者和健康专业人员的DISCERN评分显著相关(r = 0.77,P < 0.001)。基于证据的质量得分与谷歌页面排名相关(r = 0.59,P = 0.002)。然而,DISCERN评分与用户满意度之间的相关性高于谷歌页面排名与用户满意度之间的相关性。

结论

DISCERN无论是由专家还是消费者使用,都有潜力作为内容质量的指标。谷歌页面排名作为质量的自动指标显示出一些前景。

相似文献

1
Website quality indicators for consumers.
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Nov 15;7(5):e55. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.5.e55.
3
Automated assessment of the quality of depression websites.
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Dec 30;7(5):e59. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.5.e59.
4
Brief DISCERN, six questions for the evaluation of evidence-based content of health-related websites.
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Oct;77(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.02.016. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
6
Quality of Web-based information on cocaine addiction.
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
7
Surfing for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: perspectives on quality and content of information on the Internet.
J Rheumatol. 2009 Aug;36(8):1755-62. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.081010. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
8
Accessibility, nature and quality of health information on the Internet: a survey on osteoarthritis.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Mar;44(3):382-5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh498. Epub 2004 Nov 30.
9
Patient satisfaction scores and their relationship to hospital website quality measures.
Health Mark Q. 2013;30(4):334-48. doi: 10.1080/07359683.2013.844041.
10
Back pain online: a cross-sectional survey of the quality of web-based information on low back pain.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Feb 15;28(4):395-401. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000048497.38319.D3.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality Assessment of Hypertension Treatment-Related Information on WeChat: Cross-sectional Study.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 26;24(10):e38567. doi: 10.2196/38567.
2
American Anesthesiology Residency Programs: Website Usability Analysis.
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Oct 20;11(2):e38759. doi: 10.2196/38759.
3
An Analysis of US Academic Medical Center Websites: Usability Study.
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 21;23(12):e27750. doi: 10.2196/27750.
4
Stem Cells in Orthopedic Web Information: An Assessment with the DISCERN Tool.
Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):519S-525S. doi: 10.1177/19476035211040161. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
6
Website usability analysis of United States emergency medicine residencies.
AEM Educ Train. 2021 May 7;5(3):e10604. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10604. eCollection 2021 Jul.
8
The Quality, Readability, Completeness, and Accuracy of PTSD Websites for Firefighters.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 19;17(20):7629. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207629.
10
Quality of websites about long-acting reversible contraception: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Reprod Health. 2019 Nov 27;16(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0835-1.

本文引用的文献

1
[Analysis of paediatric neuro-oncological information on the Internet in German language].
Klin Padiatr. 2003 Nov-Dec;215(6):352-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-45491.
3
Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet.
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Jun;50(2):151-5. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00124-6.
4
eEurope 2002: Quality Criteria for Health Related Websites.
J Med Internet Res. 2002 Dec;4(3):E15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.3.e15.
5
The quality and accessibility of Australian depression sites on the World Wide Web.
Med J Aust. 2002 May 20;176(10):S97-S104. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04509.x.
9
Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey.
BMJ. 2000 Dec 16;321(7275):1511-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1511.
10
DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Feb;53(2):105-11. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.2.105.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验