Ott J
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.
Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Aug;51(2):283-90.
Before new markers are thoroughly characterized, they are usually screened for high polymorphism on the basis of a small panel of individuals. Four commonly used screening strategies are compared in terms of their power to correctly classify a marker as having heterozygosity of 70% or higher. A small number of typed individuals (10, say) are shown to provide good discrimination power between low- and high-heterozygosity markers when the markers have a small number of alleles. Characterizing markers in more detail requires larger sample sizes (e.g., at least 80-100 individuals) if there is to be a high probability of detecting most or all alleles. For linkage analyses involving highly polymorphic markers, the practice of arbitrarily assuming equal gene frequencies can cause serious trouble. In the presence of untyped individuals, when gene frequencies are unequal but are assumed to be equal in the analysis, recombination-fraction estimates tend to be badly biased, leading to strong false-positive evidence for linkage.
在新标记被充分表征之前,通常会基于一小群个体对其进行高多态性筛选。比较了四种常用的筛选策略在正确分类杂合度为70%或更高的标记方面的能力。当标记具有少量等位基因时,少量分型个体(比如10个)就能很好地区分低杂合度和高杂合度标记。如果要大概率检测到大多数或所有等位基因,更详细地表征标记需要更大的样本量(例如至少80 - 100个个体)。对于涉及高度多态性标记的连锁分析,任意假设基因频率相等的做法可能会导致严重问题。在存在未分型个体的情况下,当基因频率不相等但在分析中被假定为相等时,重组分数估计往往会有严重偏差,从而导致连锁的强烈假阳性证据。