• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过社区策略降低血压。

Decrease of blood pressure by community-based strategies.

作者信息

Salazar Martín R, Carbajal Horacio A, Aizpurúa Marcelo, Riondet Beatriz, Rodrigo Horacio F, Rechifort Valentin, Quaini Susana M, Echeverria Raul F

机构信息

Centro de Referencia Provincial de Hipertensión Arterial, Ministerio de Salud, Pcia. de Buenos Aires.

出版信息

Medicina (B Aires). 2005;65(6):507-12.

PMID:16433477
Abstract

In a cross section study performed in Rauch in 1997 we found a high prevalence of hypertension and low levels of treatment and control. To evaluate the impact of the community-based intervention activities on blood pressure (BP), we made a cohort study in 1526 inhabitants aged between 15 and 75 years in 2003. The initial study, the advice to consult the family doctor when alterations were found, the free provision of antihypertensive drugs, the press diffusion of the study results and a healthy lifestyle were included among the intervention activities. BP was measured in the subjects' residence by especially trained nurses, considering systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) as the average of three measurements in one occasion. A total of 1307 subjects (85.65%) were re-interviewed. SBP decreased from 137.98 +/- 0.57 to 132.49 +/- 0.53 mm Hg (p < 0.01) and DBP from 88.73 +/- 0.38 to 81.87 +/- 0.33 mm Hg (p < 0.01). Pressure decrease was observed in all the age groups, in both sexes and in the subgroup without receiving antihypertensive drugs. The percentage with antihypertensive drugs increased from 12.2 to 20.4 (p < 0.01). A significant relationship was observed between the percentiles of the BP changes and weight changes in subjects with and without antihypertensive drugs. Community-based intervention strategies were effective to BP control and, probably, to decrease the cardiovascular risk in a community with high prevalence of hypertension.

摘要

在1997年于劳赫进行的一项横断面研究中,我们发现高血压患病率很高,而治疗和控制水平较低。为了评估基于社区的干预活动对血压(BP)的影响,我们于2003年对1526名年龄在15至75岁之间的居民进行了一项队列研究。干预活动包括最初的研究、发现异常时建议咨询家庭医生、免费提供抗高血压药物、研究结果的媒体传播以及健康的生活方式。由经过专门培训的护士在受试者家中测量血压,将收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)视为一次测量中三次测量的平均值。共有1307名受试者(85.65%)接受了再次访谈。收缩压从137.98±0.57降至132.49±0.53毫米汞柱(p<0.01),舒张压从88.73±0.38降至81.87±0.33毫米汞柱(p<0.01)。在所有年龄组、男女以及未接受抗高血压药物治疗的亚组中均观察到血压下降。接受抗高血压药物治疗的比例从12.2%增至20.4%(p<0.01)。在接受和未接受抗高血压药物治疗的受试者中,血压变化百分位数与体重变化之间存在显著关系。基于社区的干预策略对于血压控制有效,并且可能有助于降低高血压患病率高的社区中的心血管风险。

相似文献

1
Decrease of blood pressure by community-based strategies.通过社区策略降低血压。
Medicina (B Aires). 2005;65(6):507-12.
2
Systolic vs diastolic blood pressure: community burden and impact on blood pressure staging.收缩压与舒张压:社区负担及对血压分级的影响
J Hum Hypertens. 2002 Mar;16(3):163-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001310.
3
Association of blood pressure status with the optic disk structure in non-glaucoma subjects: the Thessaloniki eye study.非青光眼受试者的血压状态与视盘结构的关联:塞萨洛尼基眼病研究
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jul;142(1):60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.055.
4
Effectiveness of valsartan for treatment of hypertension: patient profiling and hierarchical modeling of determinants and outcomes (the PREVIEW study).缬沙坦治疗高血压的有效性:患者特征分析及决定因素与结局的分层建模(PREVIEW研究)
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 May;43(5):849-61. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L576. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
5
A 26-week, prospective, open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter study to evaluate the effect of an escalating-dose regimen of trandolapril on change in blood pressure in treatment-naive and concurrently treated adult hypertensive subjects (TRAIL).一项为期26周的前瞻性、开放标签、非对照、多中心研究,旨在评估逐步递增剂量的群多普利方案对初治和同时接受治疗的成年高血压受试者血压变化的影响(TRAIL研究)。
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):305-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.016.
6
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.氨氯地平/雷米普利联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的18周前瞻性随机双盲多中心研究:氨氯地平/雷米普利联合治疗评估(ATAR)研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.008.
7
Blood pressure response under chronic antihypertensive drug therapy: the role of aortic stiffness in the REASON (Preterax in Regression of Arterial Stiffness in a Controlled Double-Blind) study.慢性抗高血压药物治疗下的血压反应:主动脉僵硬度在REASON(培哚普利在控制双盲试验中对动脉僵硬度的逆转作用)研究中的作用
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Feb 3;53(5):445-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.046.
8
Randomized study of traditional versus aggressive systolic blood pressure control (Cardio-Sis): rationale, design and characteristics of the study population.传统与积极收缩压控制的随机研究(Cardio-Sis):研究原理、设计及研究人群特征
J Hum Hypertens. 2008 Apr;22(4):243-51. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002313. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
9
Evaluation of systolic blood pressure control in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension.老年单纯收缩期高血压患者收缩压控制情况的评估
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2006 May-Jun;10(3):111-4.
10
On-treatment diastolic blood pressure and prognosis in systolic hypertension.收缩期高血压治疗期间的舒张压与预后
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Sep 24;167(17):1884-91. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.17.1884.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypertension control in Argentina, in the middle of a long road.阿根廷的高血压控制:漫漫征途。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Oct;21(10):1604-1606. doi: 10.1111/jch.13691. Epub 2019 Sep 6.