Battaglia Todd C, Tannoury Tony, Crowl Adam C, Chan Donald P K, Anderson D Greg
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, 125 Parker Hill Avenue, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2005 Winter;14(4):175-80.
Although direct osteosynthesis of certain types of odontoid fractures may increase union and decrease the need for prolonged immobilization, screw fixation remains a technically demanding procedure. This study compares radiation exposure, surgical time, and accuracy of hardware placement using standard fluoroscopy versus computer-assisted fluoroscopy-based navigation ("virtual fluoroscopy") to assist with the placement of odontoid screws. Twenty-two cadavers were divided into two groups and underwent placement of a single odontoid screw using either standard fluoroscopic or virtual fluoroscopic guidance. Following screw placement, dissection of the C1-C2 segments was performed to assess accuracy. A significant reduction in fluoroscopy time was noted with the computer-based fluoroscopy technique, whereas the surgical time was not found to differ significantly between the techniques. No critical breaches (those risking neurovascular injury) were noted in either group, and the rate of noncritical breaches did not differ. The authors conclude that fluoroscopy-based virtual navigation appears to have a safety profile similar to standard fluoroscopy while allowing a reduction in radiation exposure.
尽管某些类型的齿状突骨折直接骨合成可能会增加骨折愈合并减少长期固定的必要性,但螺钉固定仍然是一项技术要求很高的手术。本研究比较了使用标准荧光透视法与基于计算机辅助荧光透视的导航(“虚拟荧光透视”)来辅助齿状突螺钉置入时的辐射暴露、手术时间和硬件放置的准确性。22具尸体被分为两组,分别在标准荧光透视或虚拟荧光透视引导下置入单个齿状突螺钉。螺钉置入后,对C1-C2节段进行解剖以评估准确性。基于计算机的荧光透视技术的荧光透视时间显著减少,而两种技术的手术时间没有显著差异。两组均未发现严重失误(有神经血管损伤风险的失误),非严重失误率也无差异。作者得出结论,基于荧光透视的虚拟导航似乎具有与标准荧光透视相似的安全性,同时可减少辐射暴露。