• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专家外科医生进行腹腔镜手术的自我评估层次任务分析。

Self-appraisal hierarchical task analysis of laparoscopic surgery performed by expert surgeons.

作者信息

Sarker S K, Hutchinson R, Chang A, Vincent C, Darzi A W

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2006 Apr;20(4):636-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0312-5. Epub 2006 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-005-0312-5
PMID:16446987
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of technical skill is notoriously difficult because of the subjectivity and time-consuming expert analysis. No ongoing evaluation scheme exists to assess the continuing competency of surgeons. This study examined whether surgeons' self-assessment accurately reflects their actual surgical technique.

METHODS

Hierarchical task analysis (HTA) of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was constructed. Ten expert surgeons were asked to modify the HTA for their own technique. The HTAs of these surgeons then were compared with their actual operations, which had been recorded and assessed by two observers.

RESULTS

A total of 40 operations were assessed. All the gallbladders subjected to surgery were classified as grades 1 to 3. The mean interrater reliability for the two observers had a k value of 0.84 (p < 0.05), and the mean intrarater reliability between surgeons and observers had a k value of 0.79 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons' self-evaluation is accurate for technical skills aspects of their operations. This study demonstrates that self-appraisal using HTA is feasible, accurate, and practical. The authors aim to increase the numbers in their study and also to recruit residents.

摘要

背景

由于技术评估具有主观性且专家分析耗时,因此对技术技能的评估非常困难。目前不存在用于评估外科医生持续能力的现行评估方案。本研究调查了外科医生的自我评估是否准确反映了他们实际的手术技术。

方法

构建了腹腔镜胆囊切除术的层次任务分析(HTA)。邀请了10位专家外科医生根据自己的技术修改HTA。然后将这些外科医生的HTA与他们实际的手术操作进行比较,手术操作已由两名观察者记录和评估。

结果

共评估了40台手术。所有接受手术的胆囊被分类为1至3级。两名观察者之间的平均评分者间信度的k值为0.84(p<0.05),外科医生与观察者之间的平均评分者内信度的k值为0.79(p<0.05)。

结论

外科医生对其手术操作的技术技能方面的自我评估是准确的。本研究表明,使用HTA进行自我评估是可行、准确且实用的。作者旨在增加研究中的样本数量,并招募住院医师。

相似文献

1
Self-appraisal hierarchical task analysis of laparoscopic surgery performed by expert surgeons.专家外科医生进行腹腔镜手术的自我评估层次任务分析。
Surg Endosc. 2006 Apr;20(4):636-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0312-5. Epub 2006 Jan 30.
2
Constructing hierarchical task analysis in surgery.构建外科手术中的层次任务分析
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):107-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9380-z. Epub 2007 May 5.
3
Development of assessing generic and specific technical skills in laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术中通用和特定技术技能评估的发展。
Am J Surg. 2006 Feb;191(2):238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.031.
4
Technical and technological skills assessment in laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术中的技术与工艺技能评估。
JSLS. 2006 Jul-Sep;10(3):284-92.
5
Self vs expert assessment of technical and non-technical skills in high fidelity simulation.高保真模拟中技术和非技术技能的自我评估与专家评估。
Am J Surg. 2011 Oct;202(4):500-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.01.024.
6
Technical skills errors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by expert surgeons.专家外科医生在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的技术失误。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jun;19(6):832-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9174-5. Epub 2005 May 3.
7
Toward feasible, valid, and reliable video-based assessments of technical surgical skills in the operating room.迈向手术室中基于视频的可行、有效且可靠的技术手术技能评估。
Ann Surg. 2008 Feb;247(2):372-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318160b371.
8
Resident Surgeons Underrate Their Laparoscopic Skills and Comfort Level When Compared With the Rating by Attending Surgeons.与主治医生的评分相比,住院外科医生低估了自己的腹腔镜技能和舒适度。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):1240-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
9
Development, feasibility, validity, and reliability of a scale for objective assessment of operative performance in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery.腹腔镜胃旁路手术操作绩效客观评估量表的制定、可行性、有效性和可靠性。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 May;216(5):955-965.e8; quiz 1029-31, 1033. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
10
An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room.手术室中腹腔镜技能评估的可行性、有效性和可靠性评估。
Ann Surg. 2007 Jun;245(6):992-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000262780.17950.e5.

引用本文的文献

1
The application of human reliability analysis to carpal tunnel decompression.人因可靠性分析在腕管减压术中的应用。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 May;106(5):432-438. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0038. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
2
A novel simulator-based checklist for evaluating residents' competence in cerebral angiography in China.一种基于模拟的新型检查表,用于评估中国住院医师在脑血管造影方面的能力。
Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 16;14:1122257. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1122257. eCollection 2023.
3
Identifying and reducing risks in functional endoscopic sinus surgery through a hierarchical task analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of assessing generic and specific technical skills in laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术中通用和特定技术技能评估的发展。
Am J Surg. 2006 Feb;191(2):238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.031.
2
Technical skills errors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by expert surgeons.专家外科医生在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的技术失误。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jun;19(6):832-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9174-5. Epub 2005 May 3.
3
Laparoscopic skills training and assessment.腹腔镜技能培训与评估。
通过层次任务分析识别并降低功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术中的风险。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2018 Nov 28;4(1):5-12. doi: 10.1002/lio2.220. eCollection 2019 Feb.
4
Hierarchical task analysis for identification of interrelationships between ergonomic, external disruption, and internal disruption in complex laparoscopic procedures.层次任务分析识别复杂腹腔镜手术中工效学、外部干扰和内部干扰之间的相互关系。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3673-3687. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06656-z. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
5
Are general surgeons able to accurately self-assess their level of technical skills?普通外科医生能够准确自我评估其技术技能水平吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 Nov;97(8):549-55. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2015.0024. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
6
A systematic review of performance assessment tools for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术性能评估工具的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):832-44. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4285-8. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
7
A comparison of NOTES transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures based upon task analysis.基于任务分析的经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)经阴道与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2443-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3495-9. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
8
Self versus external assessment for technical tasks in surgery: a narrative review.外科技术任务的自我评估与外部评估:一项叙述性综述。
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Dec;4(4):417-24. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00277.1.
9
Assessing operative performance in advanced laparoscopic colorectal surgery.评估腹腔镜结直肠手术的手术操作表现。
World J Surg. 2010 Jul;34(7):1594-603. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0486-4.
10
Time-action analysis (TAA) of the surgical technique implanting the collum femoris preserving (CFP) hip arthroplasty. TAASTIC trial identifying pitfalls during the learning curve of surgeons participating in a subsequent randomized controlled trial (an observational study).保留股骨颈(CFP)髋关节置换术手术技术的时间-动作分析(TAA)。TAASTIC试验确定参与后续随机对照试验(一项观察性研究)的外科医生学习曲线中的陷阱。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Jun 24;9:93. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-93.
Br J Surg. 2004 Dec;91(12):1549-58. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4816.
4
Identification and categorization of technical errors by Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.通过观察性临床人员可靠性评估(OCHRA)对腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间技术错误的识别与分类
Arch Surg. 2004 Nov;139(11):1215-20. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.11.1215.
5
Comparison of bench test evaluations of surgical skill with live operating performance assessments.手术技能的台架测试评估与实际手术操作表现评估的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Oct;199(4):603-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.269.
6
Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery.外科手术技术技能的客观评估。
BMJ. 2003 Nov 1;327(7422):1032-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1032.
7
Using human reliability analysis to detect surgical error in endoscopic DCR surgery.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003 Oct;28(5):456-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00745.x.
8
Sequence and task analysis of instrument use in common laparoscopic procedures.
Surg Endosc. 2002 Feb;16(2):280-5. doi: 10.1007/s004640080009. Epub 2001 Nov 12.
9
Human reliability assessment in surgery--a new approach for improving surgical performance and clinical outcome.手术中的人为可靠性评估——提高手术操作和临床结果的新方法。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Mar;82(2):83-7.
10
An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.一种用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的客观评分系统。
J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Dec;189(6):566-74. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00218-5.