da Silva Filho Omar Gabriel, Ferrari Júnior Flávio Mauro, Okada Ozawa Terumi
Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):466-74. doi: 10.2319/022307-89.1.
To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the dimensions of the upper and lower dental arches in Class II division 1 malocclusion with a mandibular deficiency compared to normal Class I occlusion dental arches.
Photocopies of the dental arches of 48 patients exhibiting Class II division 1 malocclusion with mandibular deficiency and of 51 individuals with normal occlusion were compared. Mandibular deficiency was diagnosed clinically. All 99 individuals were in the permanent dentition. The ages of the subjects ranged from 11 years 4 months to 20 years (mean age = 12 years 5 months).
When compared to subjects with normal occlusion, the upper dental arches of the Class II division 1 patients presented reduced transverse dimensions and longer sagittal dimensions while the lower arches were less influenced.
The hypothesis is rejected. Significant differences are present between the dimensions of the upper and lower dental arches in Class II division 1 malocclusion (with a mandibular deficiency and in the permanent dentition) compared to normal Class I occlusion dental arches.
验证如下假设,即与正常I类咬合牙弓相比,伴有下颌后缩的安氏II类1分类错牙合上下牙弓尺寸无差异。
对48例伴有下颌后缩的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者及51例正常咬合个体的牙弓影印件进行比较。下颌后缩通过临床诊断。所有99例个体均处于恒牙列期。受试者年龄范围为11岁4个月至20岁(平均年龄 = 12岁5个月)。
与正常咬合受试者相比,安氏II类1分类患者的上牙弓横向尺寸减小,矢状尺寸更长,而下牙弓受影响较小。
该假设被否定。与正常I类咬合牙弓相比,伴有下颌后缩的恒牙列期安氏II类1分类错牙合上下牙弓尺寸存在显著差异。