Halimi A, Azeroual M F, Abouqal R, Zaoui F
Sce orthopédie dento-faciale, Univ. Mohammed V, Souissi, fac. médecine dentaire Les Instituts, Rabat, Maroc.
Odontostomatol Trop. 2011 Dec;34(136):47-52.
The purpose of this work was to compare transverse dimensions of the maxillary and mandibular arches in the canine and molar region between three groups of patients: the first group had an occlusion in class II division 1, the second one a dental class II division 2 and the third one, a class I bite. Our sample is composed of 94 patients, with an average age of 20 +/- 3 years: 31 patients presented a class I occlusion, 33 a class III1 and 30 cases presented a dental class II2. For this study, we measured, on the maxillary and mandibular dental casts of each patient, the intercanine and intermolar canine (central inter fossa). Comparison of variables was conducted using the variance analysis ANOVA; the selected post-hoc test is the Bonferrroni test. On the basis of our study, we can get the following results: Maxillary intercanine distance is narrower in class II1 compared to class II2 of 2 mm "p < 0.05". Mandibular intercanine distance is narrower in class III1 compared to class II2 of 1, 3 mm "p < 0.05". Maxillary intermolar distance (inter fossa) is narrower in class II1 compared to class I of 2, 2 mm "p < 0.05".
第一组为安氏II类1分类错牙合,第二组为安氏II类2分类错牙合,第三组为安氏I类咬合。我们的样本由94名患者组成,平均年龄为20±3岁:31名患者为安氏I类咬合,33名为安氏III类1分类,30例为安氏II类2分类。在本研究中,我们在每位患者的上颌和下颌石膏模型上测量了尖牙间及磨牙间(中央窝)距离。使用方差分析(ANOVA)进行变量比较;所选的事后检验是Bonferroni检验。基于我们的研究,我们可以得到以下结果:与安氏II类2分类相比,安氏II类1分类的上颌尖牙间距离窄2mm,“p<0.05”。与安氏II类2分类相比,安氏III类1分类的下颌尖牙间距离窄1.3mm,“p<0.05”。与安氏I类相比,安氏II类1分类的上颌磨牙间距离(中央窝)窄2.2mm,“p<0.05”。