Sorokin D Yu, Tindall B J
Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, 2628 BC Delft, The Netherlands.
Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospect 60-let Octyabrya 7/2, 117811 Moscow, Russia.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006 Feb;56(Pt 2):487-489. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63965-0.
During the course of studies on halophilic, Gram-negative bacteria, a comparison of two strains of halophilic bacteria, Pseudomonas halophila DSM 3050 and Halomonas variabilis DSM 3051 (formerly Halovibrio variabilis) demonstrated that the characteristics of strain DSM 3050 corresponded to the original description of Halovibrio variabilis and those of DSM 3051 to P. halophila, both of which had been isolated from the Great Salt Lake in Utah [Fendrich, C. (1988). Syst Appl Microbiol 11, 36-43]. It was concluded that these two strains did not correspond with their original descriptions, e.g. the original description of Halovibrio variabilis matched that of Pseudomonas halophila DSM 3050 and the original description of Pseudomonas halophila matched that of Halovibrio variabilis DSM 3051, which was subsequently transferred to the genus Halomonas as Halomonas variabilis DSM 3051. These findings raise the question of whether the genus name Halovibrio, with the type species Halovibrio variabilis, should be associated with type strain DSM 3050 and recognition of strain DSM 3051 as the type strain of Pseudomonas halophila.
在对嗜盐革兰氏阴性菌的研究过程中,对两株嗜盐菌——嗜盐假单胞菌DSM 3050和可变盐单胞菌DSM 3051(原可变盐弧菌)进行比较后发现,DSM 3050菌株的特征与可变盐弧菌的原始描述相符,而DSM 3051菌株的特征与嗜盐假单胞菌相符,这两株菌均从犹他州的大盐湖分离得到[芬德里希,C.(1988年)。《系统与应用微生物学》11卷,第36 - 43页]。得出的结论是,这两株菌与它们的原始描述不相符,例如,可变盐弧菌的原始描述与嗜盐假单胞菌DSM 3050相符,嗜盐假单胞菌的原始描述与可变盐弧菌DSM 3051相符,后者随后被转移到盐单胞菌属,成为可变盐单胞菌DSM 3051。这些发现引发了一个问题,即以可变盐弧菌为模式种的盐弧菌属是否应与模式菌株DSM 3050相关联,以及是否应将DSM 3051菌株认定为嗜盐假单胞菌的模式菌株。